Advanced Search Results
Tukaram Namdeo Yede and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-13-2016
Land Acquisition
Mr. M.S. Mohite, Mr. Mohite
Oral Judgment: 1. The appellants have questioned the correctness of the Judgment and Order dated 10th December 1996, passed in Sessions Case No.1 of 1992, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, thereby convicting and sentencing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabulal Chottelal Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-01-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 307, 341, 352 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 73(8), 439 and 482
1996(3)BomCR570; 1996CriLJ3145
M.S. Mohite, Adv.
ORDER1. Heard Mr. M. S. Mohite for the petitioner and Ms. J. S. Pawar for the State of Maharashtra. Rule returnable forthwith by consent. The APP waives service. By means of this application preferred under section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHeeralal Ramlal Parmar and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-16-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 307 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374(4)
1998CriLJ574
R.S. Chitnis and ;M. S. Mohite, Advs. for ;S.R. Chitnis
1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same set of facts, and a common impugned judgment, I am disposing them off together. 2. Vide judgment and order dated 30-7-1990, passed by the Assistant Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dhondiram Limbaji Karad Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Oct-30-2014
Criminal
Oral Judgment: (P.V. Hardas, J.) 1. The appellants/Original Accused Nos.3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 23 and 26, who stand convicted for offence punishable under Sections 302 read with 149, 302 read with 120-B,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Bhimgonda Nagonda Parvate-patil and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-03-1998
Criminal
(1998)100BOMLR50
S.S. Parkar, J.1. All the above appeals are filed against the judgment and Order dared 15th April, 1994 delivered by the learned Special Judge, Kolhapur in Special Case No. 55 of 1993.2. Then were in all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSadanand Shivaji Kadam Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-04-2012
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Oka, J.) By this Appeal, the Appellant has taken an exception to the Judgment and Order dated 30th May, 2012 passed by the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. By the impugned Judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSadanand Shivaji Kadam Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-04-2012
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Oka, J.) By this Appeal, the Appellant has taken an exception to the Judgment and Order dated 30th May, 2012 passed by the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. By the impugned Judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Anand Namdeo Patil and Others
Mumbai
Apr-16-1999
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A
2000(5)BomCR503
M.P. Galeria, A.P.P.
ORDERDr. Pratibha Upasani, J.1. This criminal revision application is filed by the State, being aggrieved by the order dated 26th November, 1992 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 28th Court, Esplanade, Bombay, rejecting the application dated 29th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCouncil of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Vs. Somnath ...
Kolkata
Nov-09-2006
Civil
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Section 21, 21(1), 21(3) and 21(5)
AIR2007Cal29,(2007)2CALLT182(HC),2007(1)CHN378
Ajit Chaudhuri, Sr. Adv.,; Arunava Ghosh,; Ashok Kumar Dhar,; S.S. Bose and; Ranjit Talukdar, Advs.
Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. This is a reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act') by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accounts of India. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharati Walia Vs. Krishan Mamlal Kapoor and Another
Mumbai
Feb-02-2016
Education
Oral Judgment: 1. The appellant is the original complainant. She had filed a complaint against the respondent no.1 herein alleging commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Metropolitan Magistrate....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »