Advanced Search Results
M. Suresh Vs. Mrs. B. Sumathi and
Chennai
Sep-27-2007
FamilyService
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213, 264(1), 264(2), 266, 300, 370 to 372, 372(1), 372(3), 380, 383 and 384; Succession Certificate Act, 1889; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1929 - Sections 2; General Clauses Act; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 87; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141; Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rule 6
AIR2008Mad18; 2007(5)CTC330; (2007)5MLJ1388
M.S. Mani, Adv.
D. Murugesan, J.1. The present Original Side Appeal raises an important question as to whether the High Court would have jurisdiction to entertain an Original Petition filed under Sections 300, 370 to 372 of the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.Manikandan vs the Assistant Commissioner, Palakkad
Kerala
Mar-13-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 35995 OF 2015 PETITIONER: U.MANIKANDAN AGED 31 YEARS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.Manikandan Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Mannarkkad
Kerala
Jul-15-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2013 24TH ASHADHA, 1935 WA.No. 820 of 2013 ---------------------------...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
itc Classic Finance Ltd. Vs. Grapco Mining and Co. Ltd. and Another
Kolkata
Apr-01-1997
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 7(4), 8(1), 8(2), 10, 10(2), 11(2), 11(5) and 11(6);; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 29;; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20 and 34;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 93
AIR1997Cal397
Protap Chatterjee, Barrister-at-Law and Sr. Adv. and ;A. Mitra
ORDER1. This is an application by the defendants/petitioners under S. 8 of the Arbitration and Concilition Act, 1996 ('the said Act' for short) inter alia for an order for reference of the claim of the plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.V.Selvaraj vs N.a.Vijayan Achari
Kerala
Oct-31-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 2186 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OS 109/1999 OF SUB...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuriender Singh Lognani and anr. Vs. Suresh Seth and anr.
Delhi
Mar-13-1992
Arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 39 - Rule 1; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34
1992(2)ARBLR137(Delhi); 46(1992)DLT725
O.P. Khadaria,; D. Khadaria and; K.L. Aggarwal, Advs
D.K. Jain, J.(1) This is a defendant appeal against ad-interim order of the Id. Addl. District Judge, Delhi dated 13 December, 1990, on their being restrained from interfering in any manner in the newly constituted business...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProtchem Industries (India) Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director ...
Chennai
May-07-1991
ContractArbitration
(1991)1MLJ519
Mr. R. Krishnamurthy
Lakshmanan, J.1. This suit was filed by the plaintiff to pass an order of reference of the disputes between the plaintiff and the defendants to an Arbitrator to be appointed by this Court to adjudicate and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA P Pathak Vs. Cbi
Delhi
May-03-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. Amrender Sharan, Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey, Mr. Amit Singh, Mr. Someshvar Jha
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL) No. 1372/2011 Reserved on:18. h February, 2013 Decided on:3. d May, 2013 % A P PATHAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amrender Sharan, Sr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.S. Madhusoodhanan and anr. Vs. Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-01-2003
Company
Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 2(13), 81, 81(1), 81(2) and 284; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 31(1), 108, 155, 159, 161(2), 164, 189(2), 193, 193(1), 194, 195, 397, 398, 402, 403 and 446; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(10), 4, 9, 8(2), 9(1) and 9(2); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 16, 20 and 20(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 12; Arbitration Act, 1940; Evidence Act - Sections 16 and 114; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 28B and 265; Citizenship Rules - Rules 3, 59 and 60; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 18; Stamps Act
2003(6)ALD1(SC); [2003]117CompCas19(SC); (2003)4CompLJ185(SC); 2003(6)SCALE191; (2004)9SCC204; [2003]46SCL695(SC)
A.T.M. Rangaramanujan, Sr. Adv.,; Gopal Jain,; Prateek Jalan
Ruma Pal, J.1. An internecine dispute between the members of a family relating to the controlling interests in companies has given rise to the nine appeals which are being disposed of by this judgment. Given the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe United Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Firm Ganesh Das R.B. Kidar Nath an ...
Delhi
Mar-28-1967
Commercial
Displaced Persons (Debt Adjustment) Act, 1951 - Sections 15
4(1968)DLT220
H.R. Dhawan,; L.N. Batra,; Rameshwar Nath and;
I.D. Dua and M.M Ismail, JJ.(1) This is an appeal by the Plaintiff against the Order of a Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Delhi, dated 30th July, 1957 rejecting the plaint in suit No. 92/91 of 1955/57 under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »