Advanced Search Results

Namtech Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(115)ELT238TriDel

1. The issue referred to the Larger Bench for consideration is, whether the benefit of small scale exemption under exemption Notification No.175/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986, as amended by Notification No.223/87-C.E., dated 22-9-1987, and subsequent exemption Notification No.1/93-C.E.,...

Chand Ram Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 194A

Reported in : 49(1993)DLT20; 1993(25)DRJ127; 1993RLR134

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Maini,; B.S. Mann,; S.K. Mahajan,;

C.L. Chaudhry, J.(1) This petition under Article 22 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 7.2.1992 passed by Additional District Judge, Delhi by which certain directions were given to the Land Acquisition...

Naresh Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationMunicipal Tax

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 115(4)

Reported in : 1994IVAD(Delhi)1084; 56(1994)DLT746; 1994(31)DRJ621

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Maini and; Madhu Tawetia, Advs

M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J. (1) The writ petition raises the question, of levy of property tax under the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation.Act,1957 (hereafter called Dmc Act,1957), upon buildings constructed in agricultural lands,inthe context of...

Bangalore Commercial Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

1. The appellants M/s Bangalore Commercial Corporation (M/s BCC, for short) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with M/s Maini Materials Movement Pvt Ltd (M/s MMM, for short) on 11.3.98, which assigned the following responsibilities...

Maini Industrial Consultants Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(106)ECC498

1. The appellants entered into an agreement with M/s Karnataka Electronics, Peenya Industrial Estate Bangalore to render the following services. 1) Finance, including wherever necessary, assisting in discussions and negotiations with the financial institutions. 2) Purchase...

Northland Sugar Complex Ltd. and ors. Vs. Punjab State Industrial Deve ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Constitution of India - Article 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1998P& H240

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Sibal, Sr. Adv. and; Arun K. Bakshi, Adv.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The petitioner, a Public Limited Company, complains that the action of the Respondent-Corporation in taking over possession of the Sugar Mill by invoking Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951,...

Darshan Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)136CTR(P& H)82

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Mittal

G. S. SINGHVI, J. :This petition has been filed to quash Annexures P1, P2 and P7 issued respectively by TRO-I, Jalandhar, General Manager, Punjab Roadways, Amritsar-I and the Asstt. CIT, Circle 1(1), Jalandhar.2. Brief facts :The...

Chadha Papers Limited Vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporat ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Reported in : (1999)122PLR536

Advocate for Appellant : Vinod Sharma, Adv.

V.K. Bali, J.1. Challenge herein is to order dated 303.1999, Annexure P-9, taking over the petitioner's unit by resorting to provisions contained in Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as...

Surinder Singh Bindra and Others Vs. M/S. Hindustan Fasteners (P.) Ltd ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 399, 400 and 402; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Companies (Amendment) act, 1988

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi32; [1990]69CompCas718(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jetley, Adv

ORDER1. This is a petition under Ss. 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'). The petitioners are four in number and respondents five. The fifth respondent Harjit Singh Bindra, is siding...

Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1/123 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016, W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017, W.P.Nos.27983-27994/2016, W.P.Nos.27995-28006/2016, W.P.Nos.28796/2016 & 28997 - 29007/2016, W.P.Nos.31159-31170/2016, W.P.Nos.31430-31441/2016, W.P.Nos.33906-33917/2016, W.P.Nos.34001/2016 &...