Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m rangaswamy · Page 1 of about 88 results (0.112 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 15 1990

Mohammed Illyas Vs. Union of India (Uo I)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-15-1990

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 200; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 127B; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 259(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2804

Advocate for Appellant : M. Rangaswamy, ;M.R.V. Achar, ;S.V. Krishnaswamy, ;C.N. Achar and ;C.S. Shanthamallapa, Advs.

K.A. Swami, J.1. In alt these Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners - operators of the tourist, vehicles or stage carriages have sought for a declaration that the provisions of Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1975

M. Narasimhaiah, Bangalore-21 Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribun ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-29-1975

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47 and 64

Reported in : AIR1976Kant18; 1975(2)KarLJ500

Advocate for Appellant : M. Rangaswamy, Adv.

D.M. Chandrashekhar, J.1. This is an appeal from the order of Venkataramiah. J. in Writ Petition No. 3785 of 1974. The appellant was the Petitioner therein.2. In the writ petition. The petitioner had assailed the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1985

K.S.R.T.C. vs. R.T.O.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-25-1985

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47, 47(3) and 68B

Reported in : ILR1985KAR4139; 1985(1)KarLJ199

Advocate for Appellant : M. Rangaswamy, Adv.

ORDERK. A. Swami, J.1. At the stage of preliminary hearing, Learned High Court Government Pleader was directed to take notice for respondent No. 1. Accordingly, Sri B, N. Venugopal, Learned Government Pleader has put in appearance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 1978

Ameer Pasha Vs. the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-29-1978

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1963 - Rules 91, 91(3), 91(5) and 163(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 44(1) and 44(2)

Reported in : AIR1979Kant48; ILR1978KAR1267; 1978(2)KarLJ413

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. M. Rangaswamy

D.M. Chandrasekhar, C.J.1. This is an appeal from the order of Nesargi, J; in W. P. No. 5731 of 1977. The appellant and the respondents herein were the petitioner and the respondents respectively in the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1985

The Hanuman Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Transport Appellate Trib ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-10-1985

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 46, 47 and 64

Reported in : AIR1987Kant29; 1985(1)KarLJ139

Advocate for Appellant : M. Rangaswamy, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is the same in both the petitions. In these petitions under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought for quashing the order dt. 29th Mar., 1984, passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1965

G.T. Venkataswamy Reddy and ors. Vs. K.V. Puttanarasimharaju and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-10-1965

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 57(3), 57(4), 64 and 68F(2); Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1966Kant341; AIR1966Mys341; (1965)2MysLJ719

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. V.S. Malimath, Sri. P.R. Srirangiah, Sri. M. Rangaswamy

K.S. Hegde, J.(1) All these petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution arise from the decision of the Mysore Revenue Appellate Tribunal Bangalore to be hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal' in Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1983

Venkataramana Prabhu Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-21-1983

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 1(1985)ACC63

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. M. Rangaswamy

K.S. Puttaswamy, J.1. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 2nd May, 1977 of the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1985

Venkatachalaiah Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-11-1985

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47(1), 57(3), 57(4), 57(5) and 64(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22

Reported in : ILR1987KAR796

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Krishnaswamy and M. Rangaswamy, Advs.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In these two petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners have sought for quashing the order dated 28-8-1985 passed by the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1984

Hanuman Transport Co. Ltd. Vs. R.T.A.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-20-1984

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 62(1) and 62(2)

Reported in : ILR1985KAR4115

Advocate for Appellant : M. Rangaswamy, Adv.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In this Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners have sought for quashing the resolution of the Regional Transport Authority, Dakshina Kannada dated 20-10-1984 passed in Subject No. 515/84-85...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 1985

K.S.R.T.C. vs. R.T.a.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-01-1985

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64

Reported in : ILR1985KAR3311

Advocate for Appellant : M. Rangaswamy, Adv.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. Respondent No. 2 bas entered appearance through Sri R. N. Narasimha Murthy, Advocate. The third Respondent has entered caveat through Sri C. S. Shanthamallappa, Advocate. Sri S. Udayashankar, Learned Government Pleader is directed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial