Advanced Search Results
N.H. Lamani Vs. Central Govt., Ministry of Rlys and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-21-1993
Labour and Industrial
Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rule 147; Railway Service (Conduct and Discipline) Rules
1993(2)ALT436; (1994)ILLJ475AP
M. Ramachandra Reddy and ;P. Pankaj Reddy, Advs.
ORDERMotilal B.Naik, J.1. Petitioner entered into service of the Railway Protection Force on June 15, 1970 as 'Rakshak', which is now re-designated as 'Constable of RPF'. Subsequently, he was promoted as Naik on July 3, 1986....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Susheela Vs. Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Boggulakunta, ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-07-2000
Trusts and SocietiesConstitution
Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Sections 2(16), 3, 6, 8, 15, 16, 17, 43, 43(1, 3 and 10), 45, 87, 88, 92 and 92(4)
2000(5)ALD544; 2000(5)ALT366
Mr. M. Ramachandra Reddy, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner is the instant writ petition impugns the proceedings on the file of the Regional Joint Commissioner of Endowments, Multi Zone-Ill, Hyderabad directing the petitioner herein to show-cause as to why the legality, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhajyam Seetharamaiah and ors. Vs. Jasti Surya Prakasa Rao and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-26-1993
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 13, Rule 2 - Order 16, Rule 6 - Order 18, Rule 17 - Order 41, Rule 23 and 23A
1993(2)ALT330
M. Ramachandra Reddy and ;P. Pankaj Reddy, Advs.
P. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.1. These three Civil Revision Petitions arise out of a common order.2. The plaintiffs in O.S.No. 98/80 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Markapur are the petitioners herein, who are questioning...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dudekula Vannur Vs. Markapur Municipality and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-28-1997
Property
Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 192 and 360
1998(4)ALD384
Mr. M. Ramachandra Reddy, Adv.
ORDER1.Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Municipality.2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ, particularly one in the nature of writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMajor S. Nagendran Vs. Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Rep. ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-30-1991
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14(2); Army Regulations, 1962 - Regulation 333(C); Constitution of India - Article 226
1991(3)ALT271; (1992)IILLJ559AP
M. Ramachandra Reddy, Adv.
ORDERP.L. Narasimha Sarma, J.1. This writ petition was filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent in Order No. 6 (181)/88/D(A6) dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Nagendran Vs. Government of India, Ministry of Defence and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-30-1991
Labour and Industrial
Army Act - Sections 19; Army Regulations, 1962 - Regulation - 333
(1992)IILLJ559AP
Sri. M. Ramachandra Reddy
ORDER1. This writ petition was filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call the records relating to the order of the first respondent in Order No. 6 (181)/88/D (A6) dated December 15, 1988...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.V.S. Bhaskar Vs. Gutha Balaji Naidu and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-17-1993
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 17
1993(3)ALT427
P.S. Narayana, Adv.
ORDEREswara Prasad, J.1. The petitioner, who is the plaintiff in the suit, filed LA. No. 962/91 for amendment of the cause title by correcting the name of the 2nd respondent (2nd defendant) as 'Etukuru Babu Naidu'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvanthi Explosives P. Ltd. Vs. Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirupathi ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-09-1985
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10, 107, 155, 163(6), 211, 237, 283, 283(1), 293, 299, 367, 391, 394, 395 and 397; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9
[1987]62CompCas301(AP)
V.T.M. Prasad, Adv.
1. The point of law raised in this writ petition relates to the jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain a civil suit involving the question as to the disqualification of the director of a company,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE. Durvasulu Naidu Vs. E. Rangaiah Naidu and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-24-1994
Family
Hindu Law
1994(3)ALT102
C. Poornaiah and ;C. Subba Rao, Advs.
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. This letters patent appeal arises out of the final decree proceedings taken in a partition suit. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 2 of 1975 is the appellant in this L.P.A. He filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHoly Faith International Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Dr. Shiv K. Kumar
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-30-2005
Intellectual Property Rights
Copy Right Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 30, 32, 40, 41, 44, 51, 52, 57 and 63; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 65, 70 and 72; Indian Telephone ActSection 20A; Solicitors Practice Rule 1991; Solicitors Act, 1974 - Sections 31
AIR2006AP198; 2006(3)ALD216; 2006(3)ALT319; 2006(33)PTC456(NULL)
V.L.N.G.K. Murthy and ;Ch. Samson Babu, Advs.
T. Ch. Surya Rao, J. 1. The second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 21-3-2005, passed by the learned DC Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court), Hyderabad, in A.S. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »