Advanced Search Results
G. Sundarrajan Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secretary to Govt of Ind ...
Chennai
Aug-31-2012
Land Acquisition
For the Petitioner: M. Radhakrishnan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mohan Parasaran, Senior Counsel for R1, A.S. Vijayaraghavan, R2, R. Suresh Kumar [AERB], Krishnasrinivasan for R3, R5, M/s. Ramasubramaniam Associates Advocate, A. Navaneethakrishnan, Ad
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Declaration, declaring that the clearance granted by the 2nd respondent Atomic Energy Regulatory Board for 'Initial Fuel Loading'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.Shankar Vs. the Chief Secretary to Government and ors.
Chennai
Mar-15-2011
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1)(e) read with 13(2)
Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, Adv.
O R D E R1. The petitioner herein seeks to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents-1 to 3 to initiate proper action immediately on the basis of his complaint dated 15.10.2010 as against the 4th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Radhakrishnan Vs. the Secretary, the Bar Council of India and the S ...
Chennai
Nov-16-2006
Civil
Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 4(1), 17, 17(1), 18, 24, 24A, 28, 28(2), 49 and 49(1); Indian Bar Council Act, 1926; Welfare scheme Act; Tamil Nadu Bar Council Enrolment Rules - Rules 8A, 6(4) and 6(2); Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 9; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1) and 21
AIR2007Mad108; 2006(5)CTC705
M. Radhakrishnan, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. Thiru. M. Radhakrishnan, who is a practising Advocate, has filed the above Public Interest Litigation, for the issuance of a writ of declaration to declare Rule 8(A) of the Enrolment Rules of Bar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.Pugalenthi, Co-ordination Secretary, Tamil Nadu People Rights Forum. ...
Chennai
Oct-19-2010
Land Acquisition
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 4(3)(2), 3(1)(3)
Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, Adv.
1. Heard Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and Mr.M.Ravindran, learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for the quashing of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE.Pradeep Prem Kumar Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Chennai
Feb-17-2011
Constitution
Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 20, 33; Constitution of India - Article 226
Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, Adv.
O R D E R1. By way of this public interest litigation, the petitioner who is undergoing his post graduate M.S. degree course in Tirunelveli Medical College and Hospital, has sought for a direction upon the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.Pugalenthi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu.
Chennai
Mar-26-2012
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 144(1)(5)(6), 134; Constitution Of India - Article 19(1)(a), 19(1)(b),
Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, Adv.
COMMO N ORDERThe Hon’ble Chief Justice & T.S.Sivagnanam, J.1. These writ petitions designed as 'Public interest litigation' have been filed, praying for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring the action of the respondent, namely, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Vetri Selvan. Vs. Union of India Rep. by Its Secretary, Ministry of ...
Chennai
Jul-22-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, Adv.
1. This writ petition has been filed as a public interest litigation by an Advocate, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to arrange "public hearings" on the Civil Liabilities for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevasheesh Pathak and Others Vs. Bar Council of India Thru' Its Secy. ...
Allahabad
Feb-26-2015
Education
Sri. Abhijeet Mukherj
Shashi Kant Gupta, J. 1. By means of the instant writ petition the petitioners have sought the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the notice/advertisement (Annexure-1) issued by Respondent No. 3-the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...
Chennai
Aug-31-2012
Land Acquisition
For the Petitioner: L. Chandrakumar, M.S. Suresh Kumar, A. Sivaji, S.Kanagarajan, G. Rajagopal, SC. for L.P. Maurya, Advocates. For the Respondent: M. Ravindran, and Mohan Parasaran, Additional Solicitor Generals, assisted by A.S. Vijayaraghavan, SCGSC, a
COMMON ORDER P. JYOTHIMANI,J. The issue involved in all these cases relates to the commissioning of Units 1 and 2 of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (for brevity, "KNPP"). Even though the prayers in these writ petitions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopalakrishnan vs Station House Officer
Kerala
Nov-02-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 36301 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: 1 GOPALAKRISHNAN,AGED 72 YEARS,"KORIYALLOOR HOUSE", NENMARA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »