Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m r achar · Page 1 of about 88 results (0.085 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 24 2007

Anjanappa S/O Shivalingaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Decided on : Jul-24-2007

Subject : Sales Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. M.R. Achar

1. Heard Shri M.R. Achar, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri N.S. Prasad, learned Railway Standing Counsel for the respondents-1to3.2. The above application is filed under Section 19 seeking for the following reliefs: i. Set...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 2007

Promad Dande S/O Laxman Rao Dande Vs. the Joint National Savings

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Decided on : Sep-20-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. M.R. Achar

1. The applicant who has been working as Assistant Director (now declared surplus as District Savings Officer) under the official respondents (Respondents-1&2) has filed this OA seeking the following reliefs: (a) Set aside Annexure A-10 dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 1998

Tam Tam Pedda Guruva Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-26-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 - Rules 8-B, 9, 11, 31-A and 36 to 41; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 64 and 115; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3331; 1998(6)KarLJ99

Advocate for Appellant : Sri M.R. Achar, Adv.

ORDER1. The allegations contained in these writ petitions in brief are as follows:The 2nd respondent issued Annexure-A notification under Rule 31-A of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, hereinafter referred to as the Rules, notifying...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 19 2004

S.R. Gurudatta Vs. the Director (Admn.)

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Decided on : Aug-19-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ367CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.R. Achar

1. How to treat period of suspension, when the same was resorted on account of criminal offence being under investigation/inquiry and ending in acquittal, is the question posed for consideration in the present application.2. Few core...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2005

M.V. Krishnamurthy Vs. the Divisional Personnel Officer

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Decided on : Sep-28-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(92)SLJ208CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.R. Achar

1. The above O.A, is filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: Set aside the Annexure-A4, bearing No. G.50/P/UBL/2003/14dated 25th August, 2004 and issue further direction to the respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1990

G. Sridharamurthi Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-26-1990

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; ESSO (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act,1974 - Sections 3 to 5 and 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 39; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1) and 25; Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1) and 23; The Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394

Reported in : AIR1991Kant249; ILR1991KAR65

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Achar, Adv.

ORDERK. A. Swami, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 20-4-1982 passed by the learned District Judge, Bellary, in H.R.C.R. No. 27/1981 confirming the order dated 27-8-1981 passed by the Principal Munsiff,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1984

State of Karnataka Vs. Kempaiah and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-05-1984

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1); Karnataka Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR1984Kant208; 1984(1)KarLJ521

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Achar, Govt. Adv.

K.S. Puttaswamy, J.1. This is an appeal by the appellants who were the respondents and is directed against the order dt. 2-11-1979 of out learned brother Venkatachala, J., allowing Writ Petition No. 65N of 1975: (since...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1986

State of Karnataka Vs. Shivalingaiah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-1986

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules - Rules 58 and 59

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2922

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Achar, Govt. Adv. and ;D.L.N. Rao, Adv.

Rama Jois, J.1. The Writ Appeal is presented by the State of Karnataka and the Director of Mines and Geology against the order of the learned Single Judge allowing the Writ Petition of the respondent and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1988

State of Karnataka Vs. Anjanappa and Co.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-01-1988

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 - Sections 71(4); Karnataka Excise Licenses Rules, 1967 - Rule 15

Reported in : ILR1988KAR1695; 1988(2)KarLJ118

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Achar, Govt. Adv.

ORDERPrem Chand Jain, C.J.1. These batches of Writ Appeals are disposed of by this judgment as a common question of law arises in all these appeals.2. The respondents ere all Excise Contractors. They are aggrieved by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1986

Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Kallur Rangappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-27-1986

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62(1), 71, 71A, 71C, 71D and 71G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1029; 1986(1)KarLJ348

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Achar, Govt. Adv.

ORDERJagannatha Shetty, Ag. C. J.1. The common question raided in this batch of Writ Appeals is as to the validity of the orders made by the Learned Single Judge under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial