Advanced Search Results
A.S. Shirsat Vs. State of Maharashtra and 12 ors.
Mumbai
Sep-13-2006
Service
Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 - Rules 18(2), 20, 21 and 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 24(8)
2006(6)BomCR273; 2007CriLJ548
M.P. Vashi, Adv.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. Mr. A.S. Shirsat is a practising Advocate. He practices in the Jalgaon Courts. By means of this Public Interest Litigation, he has raised the grievance concerning the appointment of respondent Nos. 3 to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManubhai Pragji Vashi Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jul-22-1996
Criminal
1997(1)BomCR35; 1996CriLJ3910; 1996(2)MhLj615
M.P. Vashi, Adv.
1. Mr. C.J. Sawant, Advocate-General has raised preliminary objection about the jurisdiction of this court in this contempt petition. He submits that in the contempt petition, the grievance of the Petitioner is that Respondents be punished...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit and ors. Vs. General Manager, Best Undertaking of the Municipal C ...
Mumbai
Oct-11-1984
Property
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888- Sections 105B(1) and 105B(2)
AIR1985Bom362; 1985MhLJ527
M.P. Vashi, Adv.
1. A short but important question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether before ordering eviction of a allottee of the Municipal premises under sub-sec. (1) of S. 105B of the Bombay Municipal Corporation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shahinara Salim Baig Vs. B.M.C. and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-02-2002
Election
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2002(3)ALLMR368; 2002(5)BomCR128; 2002(2)MhLj940
M.P. Vashi, Adv.
ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. Rule. By consent returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service.The petitioner after having lost the municipal election from Ward No. 108 of the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai, approached the Court of Small Causes at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharati Vidyapeeth Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jul-29-1998
ConstitutionTrusts and Societies
Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 35, 82, 83 and 115; Shivaji University Act, 1974 - Sections 43; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 39, 226, 246 and 254; Bar Council of India Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 7 and 49; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987
1998(4)ALLMR31; 1998(4)BomCR381
A.V. Anturkar, Adv.
ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Shri Anturkar for the petitioner, Smt. Gokhale for respondent No. 1 and Shri Ketkar for respondent No. 2. None appears for respondent No. 3, though served.2. This is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...
Kolkata
Jan-18-2008
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2(2), 3, 3A, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5A, 6, 6A, 6(1), 6(2), 6(3), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 11, 11A, 11(1), 11(2), 11(4), 12, 12(2), 16, 17, 17(4), 18, 18(1), 18(31), 23, 23(1), 24, 24A, 26, 28A, 28(1), 31, 31(1), 31(4), 37, 38, 38A, 39, 40, 40(1), 41, 41B, 42, 45, 45(1), 45(2), 45(3) and 52A; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617; ;West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 2(2), 4, 15(2), 17 and 21D; ;Right to Information Act (RTI); ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;KIAD Act - Section 28(1) and 28(2); ;Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; ;Validation Act; ;Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962; ;Companies Act, 1882; ;Co-operative Societies Act, 1912; ;Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1952; ;Rent Restriction Act; ;Town and Country Planning Act, 1947 - Sect
2008(2)CHN546
M.P. Raju, ;Idrish Ali, ;Chandreyi Alam and ;Aparna Samanta, Advs. in W.P. No. 28304 (W) of 2006, ;Siddhartha Sankar Ray, ;Somendra Chandra Bose, ;Sundrananda Paul, ;Tarun Kr. Chatterjee, ;Tapas Kr. B
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. These writ petitions were filed as Public Interest Litigations challenging the acquisition proceedings in respect of about 1000 acres of land within the following mouzas, a) Gopalnagar, b) Singherbheri, c) Beraberi, d)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSohan Singh Jodh Singh Kohli Vs. Chandrakanta Goyal
Mumbai
Oct-13-1990
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 77, 80, 81, 82, 83, 86 (1 and 5), 87 and 123(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 6, Rule 16
AIR1991Bom343; (1991)93BOMLR260
Arun Sathe and ;Milind Sathe, Advs.
ORDER1. This Chamber Summons has been taken out by the Respondent for the purpose of dismissal of this Election Petition No. 19 of 1990 under the provisions of S.86 of the Representation of the People Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBar Council of Maharashtra and Goa Vs. the State of Maharashtra and or ...
Mumbai
Aug-11-2011
Criminal
Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 3(2), 29, 30 and 32, 34(1), 49; Indian Penal Cod - Section 323, 504, 342, 353; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 97, 313, 135, 41(d); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - section 15, 2(c)(iii); Constitution of India - Article 145
Mr.C.M.Kothari, Adv.
1. Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, a Statutory body constituted under the provisions of Advocates Act, 1961 filed present contempt petition on 10th July, 2003 against respondent nos.2 and 3. The petitioner contends that respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYogesh Pratap Singh Vs. Government of Maharashtra Through the Addition ...
Mumbai
Jul-31-1997
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 166, 226 and 323-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 3; Rules of Business Framed by the State Government - Rule 15(1); Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 4 and 6; Central Administrative Tribunals Rules of Practice, 1993 - Rule 154
1998(2)BomCR1
Yogesh Pratap Singh in-person, Adv.
ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. We have heard the petitioner in person and all the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioner belongs to the Indian Police Service (I.P.S.). He challenges the order passed by the Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMane Kunal Naresh Vs. Pawar Vithal Jyoti and Others
Mumbai
Jan-13-1999
Election
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 28-F, 32 and 33(1) & (2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949
AIR1999Bom124; 1999(1)ALLMR491; 1999(2)BomCR135; 1999(2)MhLj102
P.M. Havnur, Adv.
ORDERT.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J. 1. The petitioner challenges in this writ petition the order passed by the Small Cause Court at Bombay in Municipal Election Petition No. 63/97 on 5th May, 1998 wherein the petitioner's candidature...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »