Advanced Search Results

Tulsipur Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. the Workmen and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1969(2)LC551(SC)

Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, by Special leave, is directed against the award, dated November 30, 1965 of the Labour Court (II) at Kanpur. The Labour Court has held that the promotion given by the appellant, to...

Arvind Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32, 34, 120-B, 302, 304-B, 313 and 498(A & B); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 385

Reported in : AIR2001SC2124; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)917; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)95; 2001(49)BLJR1728; 2001CriLJ2556; 2001(2)Crimes242(SC); I(2001)DMC734SC; JT2001(5)SC127; 2001(3)SCALE549; (2001)6SCC407

Advocate for Appellant : M.P. Varma,; Sr. Adv. Mr. M.D. Pandey,; Mrs. Anita Pandey

Banerjee,J.1. The appeal in question tell the tale of a young girl dying out of burn injuries. Whereas the learned Sessions Judge convicted each of the accused being the husband, the father-in-law, the mother-in-law and the...

Nellimerla Jute Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Appellate Collector, Central Excise ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3 and 9(1); Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944; Central Excises and Salt Rules, 1944 - Rules 3, 5 and 6

Reported in : 1984(16)ELT100(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Jagannadha Rao, Advs.

Ramachandra Rao, J.1. In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners who produce jute products challenge the validity of imposition of cess on jute yarn produced by their mills. 2. The cess is levied under the...

Dr. Lalit Varma S/O Late M.P. Varma as Karta of Lalit Varma Huf Commis ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2007(3)AWC3136

1. Heard above noted learned Counsel representing respective parties. Back ground-2. Dr. Lalit Verma, as Karta of 'Lalit Verma HUF (the petitioner) filed this writ petition on the plea that NOIDA (New Okhla Industrial Development Authority)...

Santosh Kumar and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 399 and 402; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1B), 25(1P), 25(B) and 39; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1185

Advocate for Appellant : Pushpendra Patel,; Gurudev Sharan and; V.K. Pandey,

Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This judgment shall govern Cr. Appeal No. 967/2004 preferred by Santosh Kumar and Cr. Appeal No. 954/ 2004 preferred by Gabbar Patel, Lakhan Lal and Hiralal arising out of judgment dated 13-10-2004...

Anant Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar (Jharkhand) Service Code, 1952 - Rules 96 and 97; Bihar (Jharkhand) Pension Rules, 1950 - Rules 43B and 99

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR776(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Prakash Chandra and; Kamdeo Pandey, Advs. for the Petitioners. (In Ist three cases),;

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. In all these cases, as common question of law involved and almost common relief has been sought for, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment at the...