Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m nanavati · Page 1 of about 302 results (0.098 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 23 1963

Tata Chemicals Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kailash C. Adhvaryu

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-23-1963

Subject : Labour and IndustrialContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 7, 13(2) and 13A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 12

Reported in : AIR1964Guj265; [1964(9)FLR394]; (1964)0GLR649; (1965)ILLJ54Guj

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati, Adv.

P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. This appeal raises some questions relating to the construction of certain provisions of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. The facts giving rise to this appeal are few and for the most...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1962

Patel Gandalal Somnath and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-22-1962

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6 to 37, 40, 41; Constitution of India - Article 226; Bombay Land Acquisition Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1963Guj50; (1963)0GLR326

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavaty, Adv.

Bhagwati, J. 1. This case once again raises the much debated question as to when an inquiry by a statutory body can be said to be a quasi-judicial inquiry as opposed to an administrative inquiry. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1971

Chhotubhai Babarbhai Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-12-1971

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1972Guj153

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavaty and; N.H. Bhatt, Advs.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge. Bulsar at Navsari dismission regular civil appeal No. 92 of 1966 with costs.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal briefly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 13 1969

Krishna Cinema and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-13-1969

Subject : Media and CommunicationCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954 - Rules 3 and 5; Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 - Sections 5(1)

Reported in : AIR1971Guj103

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati, Adv.

Vakil, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of the District Magistrate, Rajkot dated 21st August, 1964 (Annexure 'K') refusing to grant a No Objection Certificate to the petitioners under Rule 5 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1973

Bipinchandra Purshottamdas Patel and ors. Vs. Jashwant Lalbhai Naik an ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-03-1973

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 50-A

Reported in : AIR1974Guj129; (1974)0GLR411

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati in F.A. No. 90 of 1973,; H.B. Shah,; N.R.

1. First Appeal No. 90 of 1973 has been filed by the appellants who were, along with respondent No. 1, trustees of the trust known as 'Shri Sanskar Bharti Trust', which was registered under the Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1973

In Re: Kril Standard Products Private Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-24-1973

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 6, 20, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 23(3), 26, 37, 235, 370, 370(1B), 391(1), 391(2), 394 and 394A; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 20 and 23

Reported in : [1976]46CompCas203(Guj); (1974)0GLR810

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati, Adv.

D.A. Desai, J.1. Kril Standard Products Private Ltd., petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the transferor-company'), has filed this petition under section 391(2) read with section 394 of the Companies Act praying for an order sanctioning the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1963

Mathurdas Govinddas Vs. G.N. Gadgil, Income-tax Officer, Special Inves ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-19-1963

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 34(1) and 34(1A)

Reported in : (1964)0GLR746; [1965]56ITR621(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati, Adv.

Bhagwati, J. 1. These petitions involve common questions of law and are founded on the same facts and it could, therefore, be convenient to dispose them of by a single judgment. Certain notices were issued against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1973

Ambalal Maganlal Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-14-1973

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(14), 2(47), 6, 33, 45, 46, 47, 54 and 54B; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India - Article - 14

Reported in : [1975]98ITR237(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati,; R.D. Pathak and; Y.D. Bhatt, Advs.

Divan, C.J.1. In this group of 24 special civil applications, same question relating to the constitutional validity of section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been urged on various grounds. It may be pointed out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1980

Aryodaya Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-10-1980

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules - Rule 8

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT274(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati, Adv.

B.J. Divan, C.J.1. The petitioner herein is a limited Company and it manufactures both cellulosic spun yarn as well as cotton yarn and also purchase the same from the market for manufacture of cotton fabrics. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1963

Mahendra Rambhai Patel Vs. Controller of Estate Duty, Gujarat State

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-28-1963

Subject : Property

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 5, 6 to 16 and 23

Reported in : AIR1965Guj9; [1965]55ITR1(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Nanavati and; G.T. Nanavati, Advs.

Bhagwati, J. (1) This Reference raises an interesting question relating to the applicability of Sections 5 to 23 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, in relation to a settlement made by one Rambhai Patel of Uganda....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial