Advanced Search Results

Nandini Sundar and ors. Vs. State of Chattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 355; The Ploice Act - Sections 9, 23, 17, 18, 1, 2, 23, 24, 25, 50, 53

1. We, the people as a nation, constituted ourselves as a sovereign democratic republic to conduct our affairs within the four corners of the Constitution, its goals and values. We expect the benefits of democratic participation...

Naresh Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 80 and 86; Merchant Shipping (STCW) Rules, 1998 - Rules 11 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 32; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR2004SC2026; JT2004(5)SC394; 2004(4)SCALE214; (2004)4SCC540; 2004(3)SLJ1(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani,; Venketeswaran and; Joseph Vellapally,

H.K. Sema, J. 1. In all these petitions a common question of facts and law has been raised and as such they are being disposed of by this common judgment. For brevity, we are taking the...

M. Srinivasa Prasad and ors. Vs. the Comptroller and Auditor General o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Audit and Accounts Department Sections Officer (Commercial Audit) Recruitment Rules, 1988 - Rules 4 and 11; Indian Audit and Accounts Deptt. Recruitment Rules, 1989 - Rule 12; Himachal Pradesh Excise and Taxation Department (Inspectorate Staff, Class III) Service Rules - Rule 11(3); Constitution of India - Article 148(5)

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT354; JT2007(5)SC128; 2007(5)SCALE173; (2007)10SCC246; 2008(1)SLJ229(SC); 2007(1)LC627(SC); 2008(1)LHSC515; 2007AIRSCW2788

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv.,; N.K. Neeraj,; R. Santhanan Krish

H.K. Sema, J.1. These two appeals raise a common question of facts and law and they are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of brevity, we are taking facts from Civil Appeal...

Shree Subhlaxmi Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chand Mal Baradia and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1; Companies Act; Arbitration Rules; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 to 43; Contract Act - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR2005SC2161; 2005(3)ALD93(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)640; 2005(1)ARBLR623(SC); 2005(2)AWC1420(SC); (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN123; [2005]124CompCas811(SC); (2005)4CompLJ549(SC); JT2005

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani and; Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Advs.,; Abhijit Seng

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal by special leave has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 21.5.2002 of Calcutta High Court by which the application moved by the first respondent under Order 39 Rule 1...

Chandi Prasad and ors. Vs. Jagdish Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Limitation Act - Sections 15(1) - Schedule - Articles 182 and 183; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 47, 48, 48(1), 96 and 100

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD75(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)339; 2005(1)ARC630; 2004(4)AWC3208(SC); 2004(3)BLJR1938; 2004(5)CTC67; [2005(1)JCR141(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC255; 2004(3)KLT654(SC); (2004)4MLJ1

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv.,; K.V. Mohan,; N.M. Varghese,;

S.B. Sinha, J. INTRODUCTION :1. What would be the date from which a decree becomes enforceable for execution thereof within the meaning of Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (the Act) is the question involved...

S. Thangappan Vs. P. Padmavathy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings(Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 2(6), 10(2), 14(1) and 20(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116

Reported in : AIR1999SC3584; JT1999(6)SC464; (2000)1MLJ12(SC); 1999(5)SCALE283; (1999)7SCC474; [1999]Supp1SCR715

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani,; T. Harish Kumar,; Vikas Bansal and;

ORDER1. These appeals are directed against the order of the High Court of Madras dated 24.11.1997 in Civil Revision Petition Nos. 3476 of 1985 and 830 of 1997 dismissing these revisions. These appeals arise under the...

Bharathi Knitting Co. Vs. Dhl Worldwide Express Courier Division of Ai ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 23

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)312; AIR1996SC2508; [1996]87CompCas886(SC); JT1996(6)SC254; (1996)2MLJ146(SC); 1996(5)SCALE142; (1996)4SCC704; [1996]Supp2SCR653

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Advocate and; K.K. Mani,;Ad

1. Leave granted.2. We have heard leave counsel on both sides.3. This appeal by special leave arises from the appellant order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi dated 17.1.1996 made in FA No....

Anjan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16(4), 16(4A), 17, 21, 39, 46, 341 and 342

Reported in : AIR2006SC1177; 2006(2)BomCR538; 2006(1)CTC558; [2006(2)JCR218(SC)]; 2006(1)JKJ59[SC]; JT2006(2)SC385; 2006(1)KLT805(SC); 2006(3)MhLj867; (2006)2MLJ1(SC); 2006(2)MPHT1; 2006

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv.,; Rana Ranjit Singh and; Samyajit

H.K. Sema, J.1. The appellant Shri Anjan Kumar is the offshoot of the wedlock between Shri Lakshmi Kant Sahay, District Gaya in the State of Bihar and Smt. Angela Tigga who belongs to Scheduled Tribe community...

K.K. Mishra (Dr.) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)690

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.N. Krishnamani, Senior Advocate, with; Mr. A.K. Sinha, Advocate,;

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The petitioner was working in the second respondent organisation on deputation. On the 15th of September, 1998, an order was passed by the first respondent in the following terms. 'In terms of...

S. Bagirathi Ammal Vs. Palani Roman Catholic Mission

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Madras City Tenants' Protection Act, 1921 - Section 1, 1(2), 1(3), 2, 9, 9(1) and 9(3); ;Madras City Tenants' Protection (Amendment) Act, 1996; ;Madras City Tenants' Protection (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Section 1; ;Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 - Section 9; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2008SC719; 2008(1)AWC700(SC); 2007(5)CTC0881; JT2008(1)SC102; (2008)1MLJ165(SC); 2008(1)ICC670; JT2008(1)SC102; 2008(4)KCCRSN278

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv.,; B. Sridhar,; I Madhavi and;

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Challenging the order dated 20.7.2001 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Review Application Nos. 8 & 9 of 1997 filed by the respondent herein whereby a learned single Judge...