Advanced Search Results

Mohan Lal and anr. Vs. Lal Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(2)WLN440

N.N. Mathur, J.1. The Division Bench of this court (Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.R. Yadav and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Godara, as his lordship then was) considered the following prima facie substantial and intricate questions as...

Miss Ekta Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN214

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. Mridual, Mr. Mridul

1. Appellant Ekta filed writ petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction to the respondents to reserve 25 seats out of 120 seats for Certificate Course in Physical Education and 12...

Shri Subendu Dixit and ors. Vs. the Rajasthan Agriculture University a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN512

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. Mridul

Jasraj Chopra, J.1. These six writ petitions arise out of the same order dated 3rd/7th July 1989 passed by the Controller of Examinations, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner where by the Board of Management of the Rajasthan...

Sita Ram Motilal Agarwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)229

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dr. Bhandari, Mr. Bhandarij, Mr. Bhandari

A.K. Mathur, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed that the respondents may be restrained from taking any action against him under the provisions of the Rajasthan Agricultural Market Produce Act, 1961 and Rules...

Sayeed Ansari Vs. the State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1992(2)WLN530

Jas Raj Chopra, J.1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Sayeed Ansari has prayed for the following reliefs:1. that by an appropriate writ, order or direction, Hon'ble...

Jai Kumar Bhadu Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 - Rules 4 and 11

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2266; 2003(3)WLC311

Advocate for Appellant : M. Mridual, Sr. Adv., assisted by; R.N. Upadhyay, Adv.

Tatia, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. All these petitions heard together as they involved common question of law and facts. The petitioners of these writ petitions are in service of the Police Department of...