Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m mohanti · Page 1 of about 166 results (0.071 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 26 1958

Sri Surendra Mohanty Vs. Sri Nabakrishna Choudhury and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-26-1958

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 194(1), 194(2), 194(3), 211 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1 and 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1958Ori168; 1958CriLJ1055

Advocate for Appellant : M. Mohanty, Adv.

R.L. Narasimham, C.J.1. This is a proceeding for contempt started against the former Chief Minister of Orissa, Sri Naba Krishna Choudhury in respect of a speech made by him in the Orissa Legislative Assembly on 8-3-1956....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1965

Srinivas Ramanuj Das Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-14-1965

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1), 297, 297(2) and 298; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 6; Income Tax (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962

Reported in : AIR1966Ori135

Advocate for Appellant : M. Mohanty, Adv.

Barman, J.1. The point involved in this writ petition is one of limitation under the new Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) which came into force with effect from April 1, 1962. The Income-tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2003

Madhusudan Jena Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, United Bank of Ind ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-19-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : United Bank of India Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1996 - Regulations 4 and 18

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ717Ori

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Mohanty, ;P.K. Mohanty and ;D. Samal, Advs.

L. Mohapatra, J.1. The petitioner in this writ application calls in question the legality of the order passed by opposite party No. 3 in Annexure-18 imposing the punishment of reduction in basic pay one (1) stage...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 1999

Jawan Fruits and Vegetable Products Vs. Orissa State Financial Corpora ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-16-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Reported in : 88(1999)CLT33; [2001]103CompCas8(Orissa)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Mohanty, Adv.

D.M. Patnaik, J. 1. The petitioner, a small-scale industrial unit, was sanctioned a total loan of Rs. 7,45,017 for his factory to produce pickles and sauces, etc. from fruits. He received an amount of Rs. 5,94,677....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2001

Banamali Singh Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-12-2001

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 92(2001)CLT168; 2001CriLJ1313; 2001(I)OLR249

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Mohanty, ;D. Samal, ;N.K. Das, ;S. Sarkar, ;S.N.B. Ray and ;A. Sahoo, Advs.

P.K. Patra, J.1. The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 8-7-1998 passed by Shri D. K. Sahu, Sessions Judge, Balasore-Bhadrak, Balasore in S. T. No. 237 of 1997 convicting the appellant under section 376(1) Indian Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2003

Debendranath Balbant Ray Vs. Engineer in Chief, Rengali Irrigation Pro ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-24-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299

Reported in : AIR2004Ori156; 2005(1)CTLJ417(Ori)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Mohanty, ;B.K. Nayak, ;D. Samal, ;K.C. Mishra and ;D. Mohanty

ORDER1. Both the writ applications are between the same parties involving same question of law and, therefore, on consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties both the writ applications were taken together for hearing.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1995

Bati Kunjami Vs. State

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-06-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1431

Advocate for Appellant : M. Mohanty, Adv.

A. Pasayat, J.1. Appellant Bati Kunjami (hereinafter referred to as 'accused') faced trial for having committed murder of his son Kasa Kunjami (hereinafter referred to as 'deceased'). He was found guilty of an offence punishable under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 1969

Padmalav Das and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator, Puri Bank Ltd. (In Liqu ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-03-1969

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 90; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 45U; Banking Regulation Rules - Rule 13

Reported in : [1971]41CompCas1050(Orissa)

Advocate for Appellant : M. Mohanty, Adv.

ORDERB.K. Patra, J.1. This is an application filed by Padmalav Das, Madan Mohan Das and Gagan Behari Das, all sons of late Satrughna Das praying that, in the circumstances mentioned therein, certain properties attached and sold...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1990

Sri Hara Prasad Hota Vs. Batliboy and Co. Private Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-20-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 50 - Order 30, Rule 8

Reported in : 1991(I)OLR70

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Mohanty, Adv.

D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. Shri Ham Prasad Hota who is being pursued in Execution Case No. 87 of 1982 as one of the judgment-debtors filed these revision petitions assailing different orders passed therein by the First Subordinate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2003

Ramesh Chandra Rout Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-08-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 22(1); Orissa Excise Rules, 1965 - Rule 34 and 34(1); Orissa Exclusive Privilege Rules, 1970 - Rule 3

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT39

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Mohanty, ;D. Samal and ;K.C. Mishra

A.K. Patnaik, J.1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the sale notice No. 282 dated 25.3.2003 issued by the Collector and District Magistrate, Angul for manufacture and sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial