Advanced Search Results

Krushna Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306

Reported in : I(1990)DMC403

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Vaidya, Adv.

M.S. Ratnaparkhi, J.1. The accused-appellant is challenging the order of conviction and sentence imposed upon him by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati on 26-7-1985 in Sessions Trial No. 109 of 1984, convicting him for the offence...

Tiger Steel Engineering Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act; Procedural Rules - Rule 2.12

Reported in : [2002]127STC13(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : B.C. Joshi, ;N. Badekar and ;M.M. Vaidya, Advs.

J.P. Devadhar, J. 1.The short issue raised in this petition iswhether a manufacturer can be given eligibilitycertificate under the dispersal of industries packagescheme of incentive, 1993 from a date other than thedate of commercial production even...

The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association, a Society Registered Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 - Sections 11 and 11(3); Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules - Rule 6 and 6(1)

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR491; 2009(2)MhLj837

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai and ;M.M. Vaidya, Advs.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the appointment of the respondent No. 1 Mr. S.D. Mathane as Member of the Sales Tax Tribunal by an order dated 25.6.2008. They seek the issue of a writ...

In Re: Europlast India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 192A, 193, 391, 391(4) and 392; Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (Finance Establishment) Act, 1999; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53; Negotiable Instrument Act - Sections 138

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj S. Shah, Adv. for Noticee Nos. 5 and 6, ;Ram Apte, Sr. Counsel and ;A.A. Garge, Adv. for Creditor (Ashoka Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.), ;Satish Shah and ;A.C. Tamhane, Advs., i/b., Tamhane & Co. for

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This common order will dispose of all the pending applications, show cause notices and Chairman' reports.2. The background in which the present proceedings have emanated can be briefly mentioned as follows: The unsecured...

Vasant Abaji Mandke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionDirect Taxation

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR542

Deshpande, J.1. Petitioners in this group of petitions are all legal practitioners two of them having enrolled as such practitioners after retirement from service. Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings...

M/S. Emco Ltd. Vs. the United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

P.B. Joshi, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. The Complainant has obtained an Insurance Policy from Opponent under Marine Open Cover Policy bearing No.120400/21/026/11/021548/98. The Complainant had received a purchase order on 17.12.1998 from Rajasthan State electricity Board...