Advanced Search Results

Sandeep Kumar Jindal Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.M.Sudan

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6357/2012 & CM1696812 (Stay) 4th October, 2013 % SANDEEP KUMAR JINDAL Through: ......Petitioner Mr. M.M.Sudan, Adv. VERSUS UOI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr....

Shailender Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Director of Estates and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Sweety Manchanda, Mr. M.M. Sudan

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 8649/2010 & CM No. 21986/2010 5th April, 2013 % SHAILENDER KUMAR AGGARWAL ...... Through: Mr. V.K.Mishra, Advocate. Petitioner VERSUS DIRECTOR OF ESTATES &...

Sh.O.P.Sharma Vs. Airport Authority of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.M.Sudan

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 4867/1998 7th August, 2013 SH.O.P.SHARMA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. M.M.Sudan, Advocate. VERSUS AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav...

S.P. Tanti Vs. the Director, Cbi and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ237CAT

1. Applicant impugns respondents order dated 15.4.2002, whereby his services have been terminated under Rule 5(1) of the CCS (TS) Rules, 1965 as well as order dated 1.10.2002, where representation preferred against termination was rejected. Reinstatement...

H.L. Warkoo Vs. Kashmir University and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT333

Advocate for Appellant : T.N. Razdan, Adv

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In these writ proceedings, the petitioner has claimed directions to the respondents, i.e. the Kashmir University and the Resident Commissioner, Jammu & Kashmir, to release all pending amounts towards General Provident Fund...

Bhagwati Prasad Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IAD(Delhi)747; 83(2000)DLT116; 2000(52)DRJ157

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.K. Aggarwal, Adv

ORDERN.G. Nandi, J.1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for the quashing of the office orders dated 20.12.1995 and 4.7.1996 (Annexures 'B' & 'C-1') whereby the petitioner's claims...

Mahender Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 23.01.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 27.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 301/2012 MAHENDER SINGH ... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI and ORS. ... Respondents...

Uttam Singh Duggal and Co. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : 1988(2)ARBLR225(Delhi); 35(1988)DLT372

Advocate for Appellant : S.L. Watel,; R.K. Watel and; A. Ahlawat, Advs

Chandhry, J. (1) M/S Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. Pvt, Ltd. (hereinafter called the claimant) was awarded the work of construction of Delhi High Court building at Sher Shah Road, New Delhi by the respondent vide...

G.E. Capital Transportation Financial Service Ltd. Vs. Sks Limited and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 and 1996 - Article 37, Sections 8 and 11

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)550; 2001(2)RAJ219

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Anjali Sharma, Adv

ORDERSharda Aggarwal, J.1. The applicant. G.E.Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. formerly known as S.R.F. Finance Limited has filed the present application under Section 8 read with Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred...

Peoples Union for Democraticrights and anr. Vs. Ministry of Home Affai ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Delhi268; ILR1987Delhi235

Advocate for Appellant : Govind Mukhoty,; P.K. Gupta,; Nandita Haksar,;

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.(1) Following English American decisions, our Supreme Court has, of late admitted exceptions from the strict rules relating to locus; standi and the like in the case of a class of litigations which have...