Advanced Search Results
Chandmal Vs. Baburmal
Rajasthan
Apr-27-1951
LimitationCivil
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 29, 182 and 182(2)
AIR1951Raj150
M.M. Seth, Adv.
Nawalkishore, J.1. This is an appeal by the D. H. against the order of the learned Dist. J. holding that the petition for execution preferred by him in the court of the Munsif was barred by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMilap Chand Vs. Dwarka Das
Rajasthan
Apr-22-1954
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 245 and 254(1); Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 6, 8, 28 and 31; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
AIR1954Raj252
H.P. Gupta,; D.P. Gupta and; M.M. Seth, Advs.
Wanchoo, C.J. 1. Milap Chand is a defendant in a suit filed by Dwarka Das, opposite party, in the Court of Munsif East, Jaipur City. Dwarka Das had taken a house on rent from the applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs (Prev.) Vs. Manoharlal Ghanshyamdas
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Apr-06-1988
MRTP
(1989)(19)ECC115
1. This appeal by the Collector of Customs (Preventive), Bombay is directed against Order-in-Appeal bearing No. S/49-109/87 GC dated 10-4-1987 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay.2. The undisputed facts are that the Respondents M/s....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nitshi Udyog Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-12-1994
Excise
(1995)LC320Tri(Delhi)
1. This appeal arises from the order-in-original dtd. 21-1-1992 passed by Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi. By this order, the ld.Collector has confirmed duty demand of Rs. 36,92,424.18 said to be short paid during the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›