Advanced Search Results

Employees in Relation to the Management of the Central Horticultural E ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR357]; [2004(1)JCR409(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. The award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, at Dhanbad in Ref. Case No. 20 of 1990, is under challenge in this writ application by the Management of Central Horticultural...

Dara Gaddi Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1986)4SCC564

P.N. Bhagwati and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.1. Since we are not allowing the special leave petition, we would not have ordinarily said anything beyond passing the order, but there are peculiar circumstances in the present case which...

Director General of Mines and Safety and ors. Vs. D.L.F. Power Ltd.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR80(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

1. With the consent of the parties, this appeal is taken up for final disposal, without formally admitting it.2. It appears that the respondent (M/s. DLF Power Ltd.) entered into an agreement with Coal India Ltd....

The Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Excise

S.K. Katriar, J.1. Both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment The plaintiff is the appellant, and parties shall be described by this position in the trial Court.2. First...

State of Bihar Vs. Radha Krishna Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 30(5), 32(5), 35, 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44

Reported in : AIR1983SC684; 1983(1)SCALE789; (1983)3SCC118; [1983]2SCR808

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Singhvi,; S.C. Mishra,; U.P. Singh,;

1. These appeals are directed against a judgment of the Special Bench of the Patna High Court by which the High Court decreed title suit No. 5/61 after reversing the Judgment of the trial court. It...

Ram Chandra Mahto and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : PropertyConstitution

S.B. Sinha, J.1. In this application the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ of or in the nature of mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Patna and Sub-divisional Magistrate, Patna City to remove the encroachment...

Sajjan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR522(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V. Shivnath, Adv.

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner, a constable of the Central Industrial Security Force, Unit Bokaro Steel Plant was...

Shikshit Berojgar Pco Sanchalak Sangh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR651

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.S.Mazumdar

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. Heard Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learnedstanding counsel, Central Government.2. In this writ application, the petitioner has challenged the notice, dated 15.2.1993 as contained in Annexure...

Nawal Kishore Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Service Law

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR160(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Kumar Jha and; A.K. Sahni, Advs.

ORDERTapen Sen, J. 1. In this Writ Application the petitioners have prayed for quashing the orders dated 24.8.1995 dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioners, thereby confirming the order of punishment. The petitioners have also made...

Sadhu Sharan Prasad Bhagat and Mohan Prasad Bhagat Vs. the State of Bi ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Property

Acts : C.N.T. Act - Sections 46 and 71A

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR228(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Devi Prasad, Sr. Adv. and; L.K. Lal, Adv.

R.K. Merathiha, J.1. Petitioners have challenged the orders dated 12.7.1988, passed by respondent No. 3, in Eviction Appeal No. XV/10 of 1987-88 (Annexure-11) and Eviction Appeal No. XV/11 of 1987-88 (Annexure-11A), whereby it is ordered that...