Advanced Search Results
Gita Ram Kalsi Vs. S. Prithvi Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-20-1955
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11
AIR1956P& H129
M.L. Sethi, Adv.
Bhandari, C.J.1. This appeal raises the question whether a person who is merely a formal party to an action and against whom no relief is claimed is bound by or entitled to the benefits of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S. Mathura Dass Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-15-1977
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 454(2), 454(3), 454(4) and 454(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 242 and 243
(1977)79PLR362
M.L. Sethi and; Gurbachan Singh, Advs.
Kulwant Singh Tiwana, J.1. The appellant, K.S. Mathura Dass, along with Hari Singh and his wife, Surjit Kaur, were the directors of Amar Hire Purchase (Private) Limited. The Punjab and Haryana High Court, vide its order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFauja Singh Ram Singh and ors. Vs. Director Consolidation of Holdings, ...
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-06-1957
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226; East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 21, 21(4) and 42
AIR1958P& H305
M.L. Sethi, Adv.
A.N. Grover, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in which the legality and validity of an order made by the Director Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, on 15-13-1956, in the exercise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.W. Benon Vs. State
Delhi
Nov-08-1967
Property
Constitution of India - Articles 166 and 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 17
5(1969)DLT483
M.L. Sethi,; Chabildas and; S. Malhtora, Advs
T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) The petitioners are five in number, namely, (1) J. W. Benon, (2) Smt. Prito, (3) Dharam Chand, (4) Kuljas Rai, and (5) Jagdish Chander. The said petitioners owned buildings including shops and business...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHislop Education Society Vs. Nagpur University
Mumbai
Sep-03-1981
Service
(1982)84BOMLR67
Shri. Bobde
Bhonsale, J.1. The petitioners who are respectively an education society, local managing committee and the college run by petitioner No. 1 Society, have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMange and anr. Vs. Lalji Harnam and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-27-1961
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 1, Rule 8
AIR1961P& H325
M.L. Sethi, Adv.
Shamsher Bahadur, J.1. The surviving question for determination in this appeal is whether the representative suit of the plaintiff-respondents could have been maintained under the provisions of Order 1, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKangra Valley Slate Company Limited Vs. the Punjab State and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-06-1961
Sales Tax
[1961]12STC362(P& H)
M.L. Sethi and; D.S. Mehra, Advs.
ORDERK.L. Gosain, J. 1. This petition under Sub-section (2) of Section 22 of the East Punjab General Sales Tax Act has been filed in this Court by Messrs Kangra Valley Slate Company Limited, Kaniara, District Kangra,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanpati Ram Bhande and ors. Vs. Baliram Raghunath Jadhav and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-08-1973
PropertyContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rules 51 to 61; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 55(6)
AIR1974Bom155; (1974)76BOMLR58; 1974MhLJ512
S.J. Deshpande, Adv.
ORDER1. By this civil revision application the petitioner, who were the original objection petitioners, seek to challenge the order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Bhir, dated the 24th of December 1970 , rejecting the objection...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOgale Glass Works Ltd. Vs. the Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-14-1975
Constitution
(1977)79BOMLR37
Mr. Trivedi
Mukhi, J.1. This writ petition raises an important question of law as to whether the cost of packing of excisable goods can be included for the purpose of determining the value thereof under Section 4 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwan Sahai Vs. Ramadevi
Rajasthan
May-29-2000
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 11, Rule 2 - Order 13, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rule 3-A; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(3 & 5); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116
2000(3)WLC259; 2001(1)WLN673
R.K. Sharma, Adv.
ORDERMadan, J.(1). This revision petition arises out of order dated 6.12.99 of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaipur (West) whereby he rejected the defendant's application under Order 13 Rule 2 CPC for production of a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »