Advanced Search Results

Devi Singh Vs. Smt. Sushila Devi

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 13-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1980Raj48; 1979()WLN331

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Kala, Adv.

S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. This appeal, under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (No. XXV of 1955) (which will hereinafter for the sake of brevity be referred to as 'the Act') by the husband, who...

Mahaveer Textiles Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A, 16 and 19A

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1057Raj; 1995(2)WLC49

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Kala, Adv.

R.R. Yadav, J.1. The petitioner-establishment has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that he should be declared to be entitled for infancy period under Section 16...

B.D. Charles Vs. Smt. Nora BenjamIn and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 14 and 34; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 497

Reported in : AIR1979Raj156

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Kala, Adv.

Lodha, J.1. F. B. Civil Misc. Reference (Divorce) No. 120 of 1978 has come up before us exercising jurisdiction over matrimonial causes under Sec, 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (No. IV of 1869) (for...

Amritlal Kaushik and anr. Vs. R.S.E.B. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1991(2)WLC507; 1991(1)WLN12

J.R. Chopra, J.1. These two writ petitions raise common questions of facts and law and, therefore, they were heard together and are being decided by a common order.2. The facts, necessary to be noticed for the...

Amritlal and anr. Vs. R.S.E.B. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1991(2)WLN1

J.R. Chopra, J.1. These two writ petitions raise common questions of facts and law and, therefore, they were heard together and are being decided by a common order.2. The facts, necessary to be noticed for the...

Narpat Singh Bhati Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1990(1)WLN673

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.L. Kala, Shri. Kala

By The Court1. By this writ petition the petitioner seeks to quash the order of the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur dated 11th August, 1978 (Ex. 2) whereby the petitioner's services were terminated The petitioner...

Babu Mistri Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1982WLN(UC)299

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. L. Kala

K.D. Sharma, C.J.1. Heard Mr. B. Singhvi and Mr. M. L. Kala learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.C. Bhoot learned Counsel for non--petitioner No 4 and Dr. S. S. Bhandawat Public Prosecutor for the...

Rajasthan State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Narayan Lal Meena

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1152Raj; 1995(2)WLC327; 1995(1)WLN202

Advocate for Appellant : Puroshottam Gehlot, Adv. for R.K. Singhal, Adv.

ORDER Leave granted.Heard learned counsel on both sides. Having regard to the Rules governing the matter, the claim for enhancement of the subsistence allowance in the manner directed by the High Court in this case, is...

Dr. Jagdish Jugtawat Vs. Smt. Manjulata and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 125(2)

Reported in : I(2001)DMC605; 2001(1)WLN499

Advocate for Appellant : R.R. Chacha, Adv.

B.S. Chauhan, J. 1. The instant revision has been filed against the order dated 22.7.2000 of the learned Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur, passed in Criminal Case No. 25/1992 fixing the maintenance under the provisions of Section...

Smt. Manju Vs. Prem Kumar

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Reported in : 1982WLN47

S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (No XXV of 1955) (for short 'the Act' hereinafter) has been filed by the wife who was non-petitioner against the decree dated...