Advanced Search Results

Mangat Rai Mitruka Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1981WLN127

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mathur

G.M. Lodha, J.1. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (2) of Article 233 of the Constitution of India, and in pursuance of Rule 8(ii) of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1969, the Governor...

Hemraj Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and anr. (No. 2)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 156, 280C, 280K, 280R and 280T; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Finance Act, 1966

Reported in : [1979]118ITR744(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Purohit, Adv.

M.L. Joshi, Actg. C.J. 1. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the annuity deposit is not recoverable from the petitioner in view of the subsequent amendment made by the Finance Act,...

Ram Chandra and anr. Vs. Om Prakash and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN466

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mathur

M.L. Joshi, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.2. The sole point which calls for our consideration is whether a sale of agricultural holding made by a member of the scheduled caste in contravention of provisions...

Harikishan and Vijaysingh Mansinghka Vs. Shri Mahadeo Cotton Mills Ltd ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)518

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.L. Mehta

M.L. Joshi, Actg. C.J.1. Heard Mr. A.L. Mehta the learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. R.C. Maheshwari, the learned Counsel for the Caveator. This Court by its order dated 21st of January, 1977, directed the...

Yaqoob Ali Vs. Firm Haji Taj Khanji Ibrahimji, Udaipur

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 105 - Order 16, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment), 1976 - Sections 97(1)

Reported in : AIR1984Raj1; 1982()WLN666

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Maheshwari, Adv.

S.K. Mal Lodha, J. 1. This is a joint reference made by a learned single Judge of this Court in the two revisions involving somewhat similar questions, as according to him there are conflicting decisions of...

Chandmal Naurat Mal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 375; Rajasthan High Court Orders; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1968Raj20

Advocate for Appellant : M.B.L. Bhargava,; S.N. Bhargava and; K.S. Dewra, Adv

ORDER1. The case before us comes on an office report to the effect that a joint petition filed by 41 petitioners for restraining the respondents from enforcing the provisions of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act...

Northern Railway Employees' Co-operative Credit Society and Anr. Vs. L ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ708Raj

Kan Singh, J.1. We have before us two writ petitions directed against an order of the labour court dated 16 February 1965 passed under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred...

ArwachIn Bharti Bhawan Vs. the Directorate of Education

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226; Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rules 118 and 120

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)169; 86(2000)DLT99; 2000(54)DRJ124

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravi Gupta, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner/management of the school has filed the writ petition challenging the order of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 13.8.1996. 2. A few facts necessary for the appreciation of the question raised by...

Poonam Chand Joshi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Establishment Code; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1971Raj12; 1970(3)WLN326

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Joshi, Adv. for Poonam Chand Joshi and Pukhraj and; M. Mridul, Adv. for Kanwar Singh

P.N. Singhal, J. 1. These three writ petitions arise out of facts which are quite similar. They have been argued together by the learned counsel for the parties and I shall dispose them of by this...

Daulat Singh Vs. Ratan Chand

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR1962Raj41

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Joshi, Adv.

Sarjoo Prosad, C. J. 1. This appeal by the judgment-debtor arises out of an execution case.2. The relevant facts may be briefly set out to appreciate the point involved, which is one of limitation (sic). The...