Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m l bansal · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.078 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 20 2018

Punjab National Bank vs.m.l.bansal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 03.2018. Date of Decision:20. 09.2018. + LPA No.173/2015 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ...Appellant Through: Mr.Jagat Arora, Adv. and Mr.Niraj versus Kumar, Adv. M.L. BANSAL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1990

Smt. Kamla Devi Bishnoi Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-31-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1991)36ITD471(Delhi)

1. This appeal by the assessee for assessment year 1981-82 challenges the confirmation of penalty of Rs. 12,500 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Income-tax Officer.2. Relevant facts of the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2015

Shri M.L. Bansal Vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Mr. Varun Garg

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.824/1999 16th January, 2015 % SHRI M.L. BANSAL Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate, Mr. Varun Garg, Advocate with petitioner in person. VERSUS PUNJAB...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 31 1991

S.R. I. Roller Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-1991

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 245, 265 and 372; Plants, Fruits and Seeds (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 1989; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946; Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1988 - Sections 61 and 63

Reported in : AIR1992Bom79; 1992(59)ELT361(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Vikram S. Nankani,;N.N. Gavankar,;Dr. Dy. Chandrachud,;Anil Balani,;L.U. Balani and;M.L. Bansal, Advs.

ORDERMrs. Sujata Manohar, J.1. Thesewrit petitions challenge the levy of inspection fees in respect of inspection inter alia, of plants and seeds imported into India. These fees are levied under clauses 3(12) and 12 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1991

S.R.i. Roller Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-1991

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1992(59)ELT361(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Vikram S. Nankani, ;M.N. Gavankar, ;Anil Balani, ;L.D. Balani,; M.L. Bansal, ;Dr. D.V. Chandrachud and ;Shri S.A. Divan, Advs.

Sujata Manohar, J.1. These writ petitions challenge the levy of inspection fees in respect of inspection inter alia, of plants and seeds imported into India. These fees are levied under Clauses 3(12) and 12 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1976

Gurdial Singh Vs. Massa Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-11-1976

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100, 107, 148 and 149 - Order 7, Rule 11; Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 19A

Reported in : AIR1977P& H248

Advocate for Appellant : Anand Swaroop,; K.G. Chowdhry and; M.L. Bansal, Advs

S.S. Sandhawalia, J.1. Preliminary objections to the competency of these two connected execution second appeals have been raised. These rest on the following facts. Gurdial Singh and Gurdev Singh appellants, who are brothers, had brought separate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1992

Ajmer Singh and anr. Vs. Surjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-24-1992

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1992)102PLR189

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Bansal and; Arun Bansal, Advs.

G.R. Majitbia, J.1. This Regular Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court reversing on appeal those of the trial Judge and dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-appellants for possession...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1970

Mangharam Chuharmal Vs. B.C. Patel and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-1970

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1)(I) and 14; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1972Bom46; (1971)73BOMLR140; ILR1972Bom30; 1971MhLJ369

Advocate for Appellant : N.H. Paradasani, ;S.P. Kanuga, ;K.K. Singhavi, ;D.R. Dhanuka, ;K.R. Dhanuka, ;M.V. Paranjpe and ;M.L. Bansal, Advs.; M.R. Parpia, Adv., ; i.b., Little and Co.

1. These four petitions are filed by the 15 petitioners the alleged sub - tenants of Defendant No. 1 who are aggrieved by the order of ejectment passed against them by the Appellate Bench of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2002

Shri Kanhayalal Ramlal Bagadia, Indian Inhabitant, Carrying on Busines ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-16-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 - Sections 3(2), 4, 6, 6(1A), 7 and 8; Arbitration Act, 1940; Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property (Amendment) Act - 1970; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR414; 2002(4)BomCR54; (2002)4BOMLR781; 2002(2)MhLj802

Advocate for Appellant : C.J. Sawant and ;M.L. Bansal, Advs.

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. The Petitioner has impugned an order ofrequisition dated 17-2-1966 passed under theRequisition and Acquisition of Immovable PropertyAct, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the saidAct') and seeks recovery of possession of thepremises requisitioned thereunder....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1999

Century Rayon Vs. United Commercial Bank and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-1999

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Interest Act, 1978

Reported in : 1999(3)ALLMR107; 1999(2)BomCR650

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Bansal, Adv.

ORDERD.G. Deshpande J. 1. Heard Advocates for the plaintiffs and defendants. This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for recovering a sum of Rs. 1,11,273.50 inclusive of interest on the grounds that the defendant caused delay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial