Advanced Search Results
C. Subramaniam Vs. Speaker of the Madras, Legislative Assembly, Madras ...
Chennai
Mar-14-1968
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 19, 19(1), 20, 21 and 194(3)
AIR1969Mad10
V.K. Thiruvenkatachari, Adv. for ;T. Martin, Adv.
1. This is a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution, for the issue of a writ of Prohibition restraining the Speaker of the Madras Legislative Assembly (respondent 1) and the State of Madras (respondent 2)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Rudriah and anr. Vs. the Chancellor, University of Agricultural Sci ...
Karnataka
Sep-09-1970
Constitution
(Mysore) University of Agricultural Sciences Act, 1963 - Sections 12(2), 24, 25, 39, 40, 40(1), 44 and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 245 and 226
AIR1971Kant84; AIR1971Mys84; (1971)1MysLJ328
M.K. Nambiar and ;B.S. Patil, Advs.
Chandrashekhar, J.1. In these two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the validity of the appointment of respondent 5 (in both these petitions) as the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Agricultural Sciences in Mysore (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskW.N. Srinivasa Bhat and anr. Vs. the State of Madras and anr.
Chennai
Nov-02-1950
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 19(1), 19(2), 32 and 226; Press (Emergency Powers) Act, 1931 - Sections 3(2), 4, 4(1), 23 and 24
AIR1951Mad70; (1951)IMLJ115
M.K. Nambiar and ;A. Ramachandran, Advs. for ;Row & Reddy
Govinda Menon, J. 1. At the very outset of his arguments the learned Advocate-General raised the objection that this Court has no power to issue a writ of certiorari claimed by the petitioners, and he rested...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Firm Al. Ar. Arunachalam Chettiar and ors. Vs. Kaleeswarar Mills Ltd., ...
Chennai
Aug-14-1956
CompanyConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 31(1), 226 and 226(1); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 8, 45 and 50; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36, 286 and 291; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
AIR1957Mad309
M.K. Nambiar, ;K.K. Venugopal and ;K. Parasurama Aiyar, Advs.
1. This is a petition filed under Article 228 of the Constitution for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, directing the respondents to forbear from enforcing in any manner the resolution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Sep-14-1950
Constitution
Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950
AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628
M.K. Nambiar and ;M. Sekhara Menon, Advs.
Satyanarayana Rao J.1. This is a petn. under Article 226, Const. Ind. for the issue of a writ of certiorari for calling the records & quashing the order of the State of Madras in G. O....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Sambandhan Vs. Regional Traffic Superintendent Southern Rly. Tiruch ...
Chennai
May-02-1958
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2)
AIR1959Mad68; (1959)IILLJ613Mad
M.K. Nambiar and ;K.K. Venugopal, Advs.
P.V. Rajamannar, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of Rajagopalan J., in W. P. No. 255 of 1956 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the appellant before us. The facts which led...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaji P.K. Moidoo Bros. Vs. State of Madras
Kerala
Aug-06-1958
Sales Tax
Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4(1), 4(3) and 23(1)
AIR1959Ker29; [1959]10STC1(Ker)
M.K. Nambiar,; K.K. Venugopal,; C.K. Govinda Bhatt a
Kumara Pillai, J.1. For the financial year 1951-52 the petitioners in this case, Haji P.K. Moidoo Bros., a firm doing business at Kozhikode, were assessed to sales-tax under the Madras General Sales Tax Act by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. V.K. John Vs. G. Vasantha Pai and anr.
Chennai
Oct-31-1956
Election
Representataion of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 72, 72(2), 83(2), 100, 125(3) and 140 - Order 6, Rules 2, 4 and 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
AIR1957Mad320
M.K. Nambiar, ;K. Krishnaswami Aiyangar, ;T. Ramaprasada Rao and ;K.K. Venugopal, Advs.
1. The above appeal and petition arise out of an election petition filed by the contesting respondent G. Vasantha Pal (who will hereafter be referred to as the respondent) before the Election Commission, New Delhi. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Hari Prasad Vs. Chief Conservator of Forests, Madras and anr.
Chennai
Aug-12-1958
CivilLimitation
Constitution of India - Article 225; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5 and 12
AIR1959Mad406; (1958)2MLJ552
M.K. Nambiar and ;K.K. Venugopal, Advs.
1. The petitioner, whose application under Article 226 of the Constitution (W.P. No. 1181 of 1956) was dismissed, applied for a certified copy of the judgment to prefer an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Venugopal and ors.
Chennai
Jan-27-1954
Criminal
Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 49A and 49A(1); Madras City Police (Amendment) Act, 1949; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 19(6); Madras City Police Gaming Rules, 1949 - Rule 3
AIR1954Mad901
M.K. Nambiar, ;T.V. Venkatachari and ;F.S. Vaz, Advs. of Jan & San;State Prosecutor
ORDERBasheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.1. The first of these petitions is by one Venugopal, who has been charged by the state before the Third Presidency Magistrate, under Section 49A, Madras City Police Act, for the alleged offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »