Advanced Search Results
Madho Singh Rathore Vs. State Bank of India and ors.
DRAT Delhi
Oct-05-2004
Land Acquisition
IV(2006)BC238
1. This is an application under Section 21 of the RDDBFI Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') seeking waiver of the deposit.2. First respondent-State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent-Bank') filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P. Muthu Alias Adaikappan and ors. Vs. OA.Pr.M.Ar. Adaikappa Chettia ...
Chennai
Nov-19-1987
FamilyProperty
(1987)2MLJ454
Mr. V.R. Biksneswaran
Sivasubramaniam, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S. No. 58 of 1980 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Devakkottai are the appellants in A.S. No. 700 of 1981 and the fourth defendant in the said suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaheswari Vs. Jaideep
Kerala
Jun-03-2004
CriminalNarcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 21, 23, 42, 50 and 57
2004(3)KLT88
M.K. Chettiar,; K. Mohan and; P.V. George, Advs.
K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J. 1. The appellant is the accused in Section C.No. 1289/2000 on the file of the Special Judge (for trial of cases under the NDPS Act), Thiruvananthapuram. She has been charged with offences...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hitkarini Sabha Vs. Corporation of the City of Jabalpur
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-22-1957
PropertyCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18 and 31(2)
AIR1958MP339
R.S. Dabir and ;S.C. Upadhya, Advs.
ORDER1. This is an application for revision against an order made by Shri R. D. Doongaji. Second Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, in Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 32 of 1956 on 13-12-1956.2. The facts of the case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.R. Athappa Chettiar Vs. G.R. Ramasethu and anr.
Chennai
Mar-11-1993
Property
(1994)1MLJ612
Mishra, J.1. The plaintiff/respondent G.R. Ramasethu filed a suit in O.S. No. 342 of 1971 in the Court of Subordinate Judge of Madurai and obtained a money decree. The said decree was put in execution in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnnamalai Chettiar and Others Vs. A.M.K.C.T. Muthukaruppan Chettiar an ...
Privy Council
Oct-14-1930
Land Acquisition
E.B. Raikes and G.D. Menair, for Appellants ; A.P. Pennell, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellants, Stoneham and Sons; Solicitors for Respondents, J.E. Lambert.
Lord Thankerton: The parties to this appeal are Chettiar money-lenders and bankers. The plaintiffs respondents represent the firm of A. M. K. Chettiar, and the defendants-appellants represents the N. R. M. A. Chettiar firm Other defendants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›