Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m i sethna · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Auto Ignation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2002(81)ECC633; 2002(142)ELT292(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : M.I. Sethna and ;R. Asokan, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. By consent of the parties rule returnable forthwith.2. These 2 petitions filed at the instance of the Revenue under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, are directed against the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Auto Ignation Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)BomCR305; 2002(2)MhLj730

Advocate for Appellant : M.I. Sethna and ;R. Asokan, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.Rule.By consent of the parties rule returnable forthwith.2. These 2 petitions filed at the instance of the Revenue under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, are directed against the order passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2004

Ajai Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-16-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ377CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.I. Sethna

1. The present O.A. is filed for quashing the order of suspension of the applicant dated 17.6.2000 and issuing direction to respondents to allow him to reinstate and join service of Additional Commissioner of Police, Central...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 05 2006

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Inu Exports (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : May-05-2006

Subject : Service Tax

1. Revenue has filed this appeal against the OIA No. 21/2001-Cus dated 07.08.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Appeals), Bangalore.2. The respondents imported and cleared RBD Palmolein vide Bill of Entry dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1997

Josts Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-13-1997

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1998)LC233Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These appeals are against the Order Nos. 250-251/96-Commr., dated 20-11-1996 wherein he had confirmed the demand of duty totalling amount of Rs. 5,00,50,904/- against the appellant as demanded from them under the two Show Cause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2001

S.N. Thapa and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-2001

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ201CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.K. Masand

1. The applicants in the above five O. As have impugned the action of the respondents in issuing the orders dated 7.2.1996. In those orders, it has been stated that the President is satisfied that under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 1982

Swan Mills Ltd. and Another Vs. H.R. Amarnani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-23-1982

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1991LC306(Bombay); 1982(10)ELT445(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.T. Thakore

1. By the impugned order dated November 20, 1978, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, held that the products covered by the classification list filed by the petitioners herein Messrs Swan Mills Limited in respect...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2000

Ownes Brockway (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-2000

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)(121)ELT710Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These three appeals have been filed by the assessee as well as the two other Noticees on whom penalties have been imposed under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules have been filed against Order-in-Original...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2003

Sterlite Optical Technologies Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-10-2003

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(165)ELT467Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The applications for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery arise out of the Commissioner of Cen.Excise & Customs, Aurangabad who has confirmed the following demands and imposed penalties as under:- (1) Central Excise duty...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2003

Sterlite Optical Technologies Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-2003

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(112)LC160Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay recovery arise out of the Commissioner of Cen. Excise & Customs, Aurangabad who has confirmed the following demands and imposed penalties as under: (1) Central Excise duty...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial