Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Auto Ignation Ltd.
Mumbai
Feb-20-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2002(81)ECC633; 2002(142)ELT292(Bom)
M.I. Sethna and ;R. Asokan, Advs.
V.C. Daga, J.1. By consent of the parties rule returnable forthwith.2. These 2 petitions filed at the instance of the Revenue under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, are directed against the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Auto Ignation Ltd. and anr.
Mumbai
Feb-20-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L; Constitution of India - Article 226
2003(1)BomCR305; 2002(2)MhLj730
M.I. Sethna and ;R. Asokan, Advs.
V.C. Daga, J.Rule.By consent of the parties rule returnable forthwith.2. These 2 petitions filed at the instance of the Revenue under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, are directed against the order passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjai Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai
Jun-16-2004
Land Acquisition
(2005)(1)SLJ377CAT
Mr. M.I. Sethna
1. The present O.A. is filed for quashing the order of suspension of the applicant dated 17.6.2000 and issuing direction to respondents to allow him to reinstate and join service of Additional Commissioner of Police, Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Inu Exports (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
May-05-2006
Service Tax
1. Revenue has filed this appeal against the OIA No. 21/2001-Cus dated 07.08.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Appeals), Bangalore.2. The respondents imported and cleared RBD Palmolein vide Bill of Entry dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJosts Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-13-1997
Land Acquisition
(1998)LC233Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These appeals are against the Order Nos. 250-251/96-Commr., dated 20-11-1996 wherein he had confirmed the demand of duty totalling amount of Rs. 5,00,50,904/- against the appellant as demanded from them under the two Show Cause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.N. Thapa and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai
Aug-31-2001
MRTP
(2003)(1)SLJ201CAT
Mr. G.K. Masand
1. The applicants in the above five O. As have impugned the action of the respondents in issuing the orders dated 7.2.1996. In those orders, it has been stated that the President is satisfied that under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwan Mills Ltd. and Another Vs. H.R. Amarnani and Others
Mumbai
Jun-23-1982
Excise
Central Excise Act; Constitution of India - Article 226
1991LC306(Bombay); 1982(10)ELT445(Bom)
Mr. S.T. Thakore
1. By the impugned order dated November 20, 1978, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, held that the products covered by the classification list filed by the petitioners herein Messrs Swan Mills Limited in respect...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOwnes Brockway (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-08-2000
Excise
(2000)(121)ELT710Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These three appeals have been filed by the assessee as well as the two other Noticees on whom penalties have been imposed under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules have been filed against Order-in-Original...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSterlite Optical Technologies Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-10-2003
Excise
(2004)(165)ELT467Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The applications for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery arise out of the Commissioner of Cen.Excise & Customs, Aurangabad who has confirmed the following demands and imposed penalties as under:- (1) Central Excise duty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSterlite Optical Technologies Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-28-2003
Excise
(2004)(112)LC160Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay recovery arise out of the Commissioner of Cen. Excise & Customs, Aurangabad who has confirmed the following demands and imposed penalties as under: (1) Central Excise duty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »