Advanced Search Results

Rajinder Mohan Sehgal and ors. Vs. Dr. Y.S. Parmar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Himachal Pradesh Courts Order, 1948 - Section 16(1); ;Punjab Courts Act, 1918 - Section 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1976HP1

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitkara, Adv. for; Trilok Chand and Ors.

R.S. Pathak, C.J.1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioners challenge the validity of two, notifications dated January 21, 1974 whereby the Governor of Himachal Pradesh has fixed the headquarters of...

Miss Pooja Uppal and ors. Vs. Himachal Pradesh Board of School Educati ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education Act, 1968 - Section 26; ;Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education Regulations, 1970 - Regulation 9; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1989HP72

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kanwar,; R.K. Gautam and; M.G. Chitkara, Advs.

V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. These three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution relate to the grievance of some students who appeared in the matriculation examination conducted by the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education in...

Pratap Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 549

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi477

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitkara,; S.S. Dehsta and; Inder Singh, Advs

S. Rangarajan, J.(1) This judgment will also dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 1969, which has been preferred by the State against the acquittal of Kalmi Nand (38) and Karam Chand (40).(2) The appellants (the...

Ganga Ram Vs. Khiala Ram Bansi Lal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 6 - Order 5, Rule 17; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 164

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT676

Advocate for Appellant : M. Chitkara,; A.C. Sud and; M.V. Sharma, Advs

T.V.R Tatachari, J.(1) This Second Appeal has been filed by one Ganga Ram, a judgment.debtor, against the jadgment of the District Judge, Mahasu and Kinnaur Districts, Himachal Pradesh, dated 20th December, 1966, in C M.A.No 37-M/l4...

Ram Rakha and ors. Vs. Smt. Ram Rakhi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Punjab Customary Law

Advocate for Appellant : K.D. Sood and Pratima Malhotra, Advs.

V.P. Gupta, J.1. The following question has been referred to this Bench:'Whether under the Punjab Customary Law a daughter has a right to succeed to the non-ancestral property of the collateral of her deceased father as...

Sohan Lal Etc. Vs. Mohan Lal

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1354

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. M. G. Chitkara

ORDERChet Ram Thakur, J.1. This is a reference made by the learned Sessions Judge Simla recommending that the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Theog, on 5-1-1973, under the provisions of Section 133 of the Code...

Raj Paul Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1501

V.P. Gupta, J.1. The appellant was employed as an accountant in the office of the Chief Medical Officer, Chamba in May/June 1973. One Anant Ram s/o Sukhdyal (now deceased) was employed as a peon in the...

Ramesh Chandra Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 309; Conditions of Service of Union Territories Employees Rules, 1959 - Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi129

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitkara, Adv

H.R. Khanna, J.1. Romesh Chander petitioner by means of this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to revise the pay scale of the...

inder Singh Vs. Gulzara Singh and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913; Punjab Pre-emption (Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 13, 15, 15(1) and 17; Hindu Succession Act - Sections 8 and 9; Punjab Alienation of Land Act, 1900 - Sections 3(4), 14, 23, 24 and 29

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi154; 4(1968)DLT660

Advocate for Appellant : T.C. Chitkara and; M.G. Chitkara, Advs

S.K. Kapur, J.1. By registered sale deed dated July 26, 1963, Kartar Singh sold 6 Kanals and 4 Marias of land being a share in joint land, in favor of Gulzara Singh and Wattan Singh respondents...

Goruk Mal Vs. Himachal Pradesh Government

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 88; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT191

Advocate for Appellant : T.C. Chitkara,; M.G. Chitkara and; Chabildas, Advs

S.K. Kapur, J.(1) The petitioner is a registered partnership firm and is a whole-sale dealer in food-grains, Kariana, cemet, vanaspsti, molasses and general merchandise at Maranda, District Kangra. The Punjab Rcorgaization Act, 1966 (Act No. 31...