Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m g chitale · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 12 1979

Jaysing Rangarao Raut Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Board and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-1979

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 149, 341, 353 and 427

Reported in : (1980)ILLJ117Bom

1. The petitioner in the present petition was an employee of the 1st respondent. The petitioner as well as other employees of the 1st respondent were members of a trade union known as the Maharashtra Rajya...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1982

A.S. Kasinathan Vs. Madras Dock Labour Board

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1982

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 11 and 11A

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ364Mad; (1983)IIMLJ103

1. The petitioner herein was working as a tally clerk in the Madras Dock Labour Board from 1961. In 1971 he was made the President of the Tamil Nadu Port Trust and Dock Labour Board Dressed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2003

N.R.C. Employees' Union Vs. N.R.C. Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-27-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR825

Advocate for Appellant : Ravindra Nair, Adv.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.Perused the records.2. The petitioners challenge concurrent judgments and orders passed by both the courts below dismissing the complaint filed against the respondents alleging unfair labour practice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 1951

Bhagwan Shankar Vs. Rajaram Bapu Vithal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-1951

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13 and 20; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1951Bom125; (1951)53BOMLR398; ILR1952Bom65

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitale, Adv.

Chagla, C.J.1. The applt. before us obtained a money decree in the Joint Second Class Subordinate Judge's Ct. at Sholapur. This decree was transferred to the Ct. of Nyayadhish, Akalkot. The darkhast for the execution of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 1951

Rakhmabai Kachu Vs. Sitabai Kachu

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-1951

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7 and 9; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(1), 3(2) and 3(3) ;

Reported in : AIR1952Bom160; (1952)54BOMLR55; ILR1952Bom455

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitale, Adv.

[1] This is an appeal from an order made by the District Judge, Nasik, appointing the Deputy Nazir as guardian of the property of a minor by name Khanderao. The facts leading up to the application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1948

Ganpatrao Vishwanathappa Vs. Bhimrao Sahibrao

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-1948

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52, 53 and 53(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Bom278; (1950)52BOMLR154

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitale, Adv.

Bavdekar, J.1. This is an appeal from a suit filed by the appellant to recover possession of certain lauds which he had purchased in execution of a decree which he had obtained against one Sahebrao Patil,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1952

Tattya Mohyaji Dhomse Vs. Rabha Dadaji Dhomse

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-03-1952

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Acts : Hindu Law; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 44; Marriage Restraint Act, 1929; Dekkhan Agriculturists Relief Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 38

Reported in : AIR1953Bom273; (1953)55BOMLR40; ILR1953Bom570

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitale, Adv.

Rajadhyaksha, J.(1) The plaintiff in the suit from which this second appeal arises was one Rabha Dadaji. Dadaji had four sons, Balm, Ganga, Taba and Rabha. The four brothers formed a Joint family of which the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1952

Sakharam and ors. Vs. Pandurang Raghunath and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1952

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 91; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 34, Rule 1; Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act - Sections 15D

Reported in : AIR1953Bom315; (1953)55BOMLR286; ILR1953Bom727

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitale, Adv.

(1) The short question which arises for decision in this appeal is whether as permanent tenants of the land the plaintiffs are entitled to redeem the mortgage executed by the landlord in respect of the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1952

Gopal Raghunath and ors. Vs. Govind Pandurang

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-1952

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Debit Laws; Deccan Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1879 - Sections 1; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1947; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 56(1); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1939 - Sections 56, 85 and 86

Reported in : AIR1953Bom198; (1953)55BOMLR74; ILR1953Bom431

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Chitale, Adv.

ORDER[1] An interesting question arises in this revision application as to whether the Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act was in force on 27-5-1950, when opponent 1 filed a suit under the Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act. [2] Now,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1951

Tukaram Savalaram Vs. Narayan Balkrishna

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-07-1951

Subject : Civil

Acts : Debt Law; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 2(5), 4 and 5; Dekkhan Agriculturists Relief Act - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1952Bom144; (1952)54BOMLR88; ILR1952Bom565

Advocate for Appellant : A.G. Desai and M.G. Chitale, Advs.

[1] This is an application in revision against a decision of the District Judge, Kolaba, by which ha held that opponent No. 1 was a debtor and his debts could be adjusted under the Bombay Agricultural...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial