Advanced Search Results

Dr. Surendra Ramlal Tiwari and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Practices Act, 1966 - Section 37, 31(6), 22(c); National Institutes of Technology Act, (NIT) - Section 16(1)(d); Constitution Of India - Article 21

Advocate for Appellant : Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Adv.

1. By this petition, the challenge is to action of Respondent No. 2 in allotting land reserved for Primary School, Secondary School and Playground to Respondent No. 4 - Educational Institution/ Trust. The petition has been...

Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal and ors. Vs. Maharashtra University of Hea ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998 - Sections 4, 5, 2(21), 2(25), 2(26), 2(35), 16, 16(8), 27, 53 and 73; Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 - Sections 2(1); Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 354, 468, 471, 506B and 509; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 309; Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979; Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Rules; Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Regulations; Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Ordinance

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR499; 2007(5)BomCR147

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Bhangde, Sr. A. and ;R.M. Bhangde, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 1976/2006 and 1066/2007 and ;Z.A. Haq, Adv. in W.P. No. 865/2007;Z.A. Haq, Adv. in W.P. No. 1066/2007

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. Writ Petition No. 1976 of 2006 filed by Management/ Employer is to be considered along with Writ Petition No. 1066/2007 filed also by Management and Writ Petition No. 865/2007 filed by Employees. Criminal...

Mukesh S/O Kamalnarayan Tiwari Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.G. Bhangde; Mr. A. Shelat, Advs.

ORAL (PER S.A. BOBDE, J.)1] Rule returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties finally by consent.2] The petitioner has approached this Court against the removal of his name from the panel prepared for selection...

Damodhar Laxmanrao Kumbodh by Lrs. Pramod S/O Damodarrao Kumbodh and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 5A(2), 6, 6(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 11, 11A, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4), 23(1), 48 and 48(1); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR589; 2008(5)MhLj123

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Bhangde, Sr. Adv.

R.C. Chavan, J.1. The petitioners seek to have proceedings for acquisition of their lands bearing Survey Nos. 25, 28/1 and 28/2 at village Bhaipur, Tahsil Arvi, District Wardha quashed on the following grounds:(i) Petitioners had developed...

Atlas Transport Company Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299

Reported in : 2004(3)MhLj809

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Bhangde, Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. The decision of the respondent No. 1 State Government rejecting the tender of the petitioner for the transportation of foodgrains and other...

Khubiram S/O Bodalram Sharma and ors. Vs. Resident Deputy Collector an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR668; 2004(3)MhLj953

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Bhangde, Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Resident Deputy Collector, Amravati dated 17-5-1991 thereby partly allowing the appeal of the respondent No. 2 and granting permission to the respondent No....

Smt. Usha W/O Pandurang Dhabekar Vs. Prakash Sahakari Griha Nirman San ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rule 98 and 99

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR136

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Bhangde, Adv.

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Correctness of the order passed by the Executing Court under section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, directing the restoration of possession of the suit plot in favour of non-applicant No. 2 Vijay...

Ramesh S/O Shri Rambhauji Majrikar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-Notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Section 11(2), 11(1)(a)(b), 13, 10, 11, 6, 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 14, 20, ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 199, 200, 193(2), 304B; Maharashtra Act No.23 of 2001 - Section 6(2), 7(1); Constitution Scheduled Tribes Order, 1950; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Section 3(5) ; Indian Evidence Act - Section 113B

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.G. Bhangde; Mr. R.M. Bhangde, Advs.

1. Due to limited arguments and controversy presented before us which centers around scope and relevance of Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-Notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation...

Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 8 and 20

Reported in : AIR1997Bom395; 1997(3)ALLMR257; 1997(4)BomCR365; 1997(3)MhLj315

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Bhangde and ;V.V. Bhangde, Advs.

1. Admit.Heard finally with the consent of the parties.2. This judgment shall govern appeal Against Order Nos. 12096 and 121/96 as the facts and even the parties are practically identical. By these appeals,the orders passed by...

N.K. Harchandani Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTPProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 40, 44, 46, 47, 52, 53, 93, 124(C), 151 and 151(1); Employees State Isurance Act - Sections 85B, 85B(1) and 94A; Constitution of India - Article 166 and 166(3); Hyderabad Abolition of Inam and Cash Grants Act, 1954 - Sections 2A and 2A(2); Motor Vechiles Act, 1939 - Sections 68C and 68D; Development Control Rules - Rule 15; Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3A and 3C; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Nagpur Municipal Corporation Act, 1948; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; Industrial Township Act, 1965; Maharashtra and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936; Maharashtra

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR256; 2006(5)MhLj817

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Bhangde, Sr. A.C.

Chavan R.C., J.1. This petition and the applications for intervention expose how lack of precision in the legal regime governing developmental activities in Nagpur city have enabled people without scruples to take the system for a...