Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m d misra · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.203 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 2002

Moh. Kallu Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, Moradabad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 11, 19, 21, 21(2), 44A and 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC753

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Misra and ;R.C. Srivastava, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 11.1.2002 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. The writ petition arises out of the proceedings under Section 20...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2004

Beche Lal Vs. Commissioner and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Dealers (Licencing and Restriction of Hoarding) Order, 1989; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 11, 95A and 96A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules - Rules 31, 32, 33 and 35A; Constitution of India - Articles 162 and 243G

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1605

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Misra, Adv.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Heard Shri M. D, Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Shri R. K. Awasthi, learned standing counsel on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. No one has put in appearance on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2002

Akhileshwar Prasad Dwivedi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-27-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Swadeshi Cotton Mills, (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 5

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC3135; [2002(95)FLR313]

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Misra, Adv.

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed praying for several reliefs. The first relief is that awrit of mandamus be issued commanding the respondents to pay him the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 17 1999

Sadanand Pandey Vs. Managing Director, Utter Pradesh Export Corporatio ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-17-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 7

Reported in : (1999)2UPLBEC1243

Advocate for Appellant : M.P. Misra, ;S.K. Banerjee, ;Rajiv Sharma and ;Murlidhar, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner alleges the he was originally employed in the Directorate of Industries, Handicrafts Division, Kanpur. Subsequently his services were placed at the disposal of the respondent No. 1, U.P. Export Corporation Limited,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2004

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jai Prakash Tripathi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-2004

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 166(1), 170 and 173

Reported in : II(2004)ACC677; 2004ACJ1377

Advocate for Appellant : Anand Kumar Sinha, Adv.

A.K. Yog and V.N. Singh, JJ.1. Heard Mr. Anand Kumar Sinha, on behalf of the appellant as well as Mr. M.D. Misra, on behalf of claimants-respondents.2. Alok Kumar Tripathi, son of Jai Prakash Tripathi claimant/respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

Rakesh Kumar Son of Bhagat Ram Vs. Committee of Management, Shivpati D ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3602; [2007(115)FLR523]

S.N. Srivastava, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Naugarh, District Siddharthnagar, dated 20.2.2001 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) deciding Issue No. 2 and allowing the preliminary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1991

Soman and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-18-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 226; Bar Council Rules - Rule 39

Reported in : AIR1992All50

Advocate for Appellant : Swaraj Prakash and ;K.P. Pandey, Advs.

ORDER1. This petition was listed for orders on 17-9-1991, when the case taken up, Sri K. P. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, made an oral request that the petition may be dismissed to which Sri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2004

Mahesh Prasad Vs. Director, State Educational Research and Training Bo ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-2004

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2711

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Misra and ;D.S. Prajapati, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri M.D. Mishra on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.2. This writ petition can be disposed of without awaiting counter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2005

Baitullah, Pradhan, Gram Panchayat Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 - Rule 3(2)

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3863M

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Misra, Adv.

Ajoy Nath Ray, C.J. and Ashok Bhushan, J.1. The appeal is summarily taken up and disposed of.2. It is from an order passed by an Hon'ble Single Judge dated 1.7.2005, whereby his Lordship refused to interfere...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2006

Anil Kumar Son of Ram Nandan and Ram Autar Son of Ram Sakal Vs. State ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3(4), 122B, 122B(4A), 122B(4F) and 333; Uttar Pradesh High Court (Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1962; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3833

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Misra, Adv.

B.S. Chauhan and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.1. We have heard Sri M.D. Mishra, learned Counsel for the appellants, and Sri Chandra Kesh Rai, learned standing counsel for the respondents.2. This appeal has been filed against the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial