Advanced Search Results

Firm Ramnath Ramchander Vs. Firm Bhagatram and Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 14; High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 59; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1960Raj219

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Bhargava, Adv.

Chhangani, J. 1. This is a first appeal by the defendants against the decree dated 14th of August, 1951 for an amount of Rs. 9,500/3/- passed by the Civil Judge, Kishangarh against them and in favour...

The Bikaner Textile Merchants Syndicate Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(4), 10(1), 42(1) and 42(3)

Reported in : AIR1964Raj255; [1965]58ITR169(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Bhargava, Adv.

Shinghal, J. 1. The first of these two references has beenmade under Section 66(1) and the second underSection 66(2) of the Income-tax Act of 1922, hereafter referred to as the Act. Reference No.6 of 1962 has...

Sudarshanlal Bajaj Vs. S.P. Agarwala and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 1702, 1705, 1707 and 1710

Reported in : (1966)ILLJ245Raj

Advocate for Appellant : Sagar Mal Mehta, Adv.

D.S. Dave, C.J.1. This is a writ application by Sudarshanlal Bajaj under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of an order dated 6th May, 1963, passed by the Divisional Operating Superintendent, Western...

Rajasthan Financial Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, New De ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1967]65ITR112(Raj)

KAN SINGH J. - This is a reference under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and raises a short question whether the loss amounting to Rs. 21,770 sustained by the assessee as a result...

Durga Prasad Choudhary Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1968WLN131

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.D. Bhargava

L.N. Chhangani, J.1. Petitioner Durga Pershad Choudhary was convicted by the Additional Munsif-Magistra+e, Ajmer City, Ajmer, of an offence under Section 500, Indian Penal Code, and was sentenced to one year's simple imprisonment and a fine...

Chandra Stores, Ajmer Vs. Cloth Merchants Association, Ajmer

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 5, Rule 1(2) - Order 41, Rules 17 and 19

Reported in : AIR1964Raj197

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Bhargava, Adv.

Modi, J.1. This is an application by Messrs. Chandra Stores, Ajmer, appellant in D. B. Civil First Appeal No. 46 of 1956, under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for the...

Lakshmi NaraIn Lath Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3)

Reported in : [1969]73ITR402(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Bhargava, Adv.

1. We have before us a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench ' B ') under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, hereinafter to be referred as the 'Act', which was made...

Laxmi NaraIn Lath Trust Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3)

Reported in : AIR1966Raj154

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Bhargava, Adv.

Kan Singh, J.1. We have before us a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Branch 'B') under Section 68(1) of the Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922 hereinafter to be referred as the 'Act', which was...

Totalal Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 295, 295(1) and 295(3)

Reported in : AIR1963Raj6

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Bhargava, Adv.

ORDERC.B. Bhargava, J. 1. Petitioner Totalal, who at the relevant time, was a Director of the Edward Mills Co. Ltd., Beawar (hereinafter called the Mills) incorporated and registered as a public limited company under the provisions...

Firm Ramnath Ramachandra Vs. Firm Bhagatram and Co., Madanganj

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 13 and 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41

Reported in : AIR1959Raj149

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Bhargava, Adv.

Dave, J. 1. This case comes on a reference made by learned Judges of a Division Bench of this Court in a first appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree of the Civil...