Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m chockalingam · Page 1 of about 225 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 22 2015

Kharatilal Haveliram Kalra (since deceased) by his legal heirs and rep ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.B. Shukre, J. 1. This is an appeal preferred against the judgment and order dated 25th September 1998 passed in First Appeal No.563/1982 thereby allowing the appeal and partly decreeing the suit of the appellants by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1953

Ramnad District Central Co-operative Bank, Through Its Secretary Vs. O ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-1953

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 4, 5, 28(6) and 53; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Madras Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 57A

Reported in : AIR1954Mad12; (1953)2MLJ359

Advocate for Appellant : M. Chockalingam, Adv.

1. In this appeal a point of significance on which there is divergence in the views expressed in judicial pronouncements has to be considered, and as the matter relates to the jurisdiction of courts we shall...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2011

Mrs.K.Rajeswari and ors. Vs. M.V.Shanmugam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-2011

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act - Section 8; Evidence Act - Section 92; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Section 4-A

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy, Adv.

1. The Appeal Suit (First Appeal) is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2006 in O.S.No.36 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court No.2), Salem.2. The averments in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 02 2015

Selvam Vs. The State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2015

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02. 11-2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.CHOCKALINGAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.424 of 2009 Chandrasekaran ..Appellant ..vs.. State by Inspector of Police, Thammampatti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2014

Radha Vs. the Superintendent

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-25-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 1-10-2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.CHOCKALINGAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH OSA Nos.230 and 231 of 2009 and MP Nos.1, 2, 3 & 4 of 2009...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2014

The Kallidaikurichi Weavers Co Operative Vs. the Deputy Director

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-2014

Subject : Arbitration

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 10.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.CHOCKALINGAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH O.S.A.No.306 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 M/s. United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd. Acting through its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1982

Patel Volkart (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Karnat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-29-1982

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9(2) and 15; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5(4), 13, 13(2), 13(2A), 20, 22, 23 and 25A; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 8(1A)

Reported in : [1986]62STC411(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. B. V. Katageri

Rama Jois, J.1. In this revision petition presented under section 23 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the following question of law arises for consideration : 'Whether an assessee,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2009

Scanwell Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Blaiklock Compass World Trans ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 454(5); Madras High Court Original Side Rules - Order 36, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 37 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas491(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Poornam, Adv.

ORDERM. Chockalingam, J.1. When these appeals were taken up for enquiry, the learned Senior Counsel Mr. T.K. Seshadri appearing for the first respondent raised a question as to the maintainability of the appeals.2. On the point...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2001

Raj Kumar Deorah and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-24-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35(1), 143(3), 154, 154(3), (7), 155, 155(1), 245D(4), 250, 254, 260, 262, 263 and 264; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 35

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Saraf, Sr. Adv., K.K. Gupta and R.K. Agarwala, Advs.

J.N. Sarma, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated March 13, 1995, passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle II(1), Guwahati, under Section 155 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2003

K. Palanisamy, Vs. Kaliammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2003Mad346

Advocate for Appellant : V. Ayyadurai, Adv.

M. Chockalingam, J. 1. At this admission stage, heard the learned Counsel for both sides. 2. No case is made out by the appellants for making admission of this second appeal, since the Court is unable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial