Advanced Search Results

Ashok Leyland Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17

Reported in : 23(1983)DLT278; 1983(4)DRJ118; 1983RLR519

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Sanghvi,; M.C. Sekharan and; U.L. Watwani, Advs

D.R. Khanna, J.(1) On a petition moved under section 14 of the Arbitration Act by M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd., Dr. Bakshish Singh, Additional Adviser, Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, who acted...

Gopal Sisodia Vs. Union of India, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 239; Delhi Administration Act, 1966 - Sections 11

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi299

Advocate for Appellant : B.R. Kapur,; B.N. Lokur and; M.C. Sekharan, Advs

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) Caveat has been entered by the respondents represented by Mr. B. N. Lokur with Mr. M. Chandrasekharan.(2) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks theissue of a writ or direction restraining...

Union of India Vs. Punjab Colonising Company

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT58

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Sekharan and; J.M. Lal, Advs

A.B. Rohatgi, J. (1) These are three appeals. One is by the owner (R.P.A. 172 of 1967) and the other two (R.F.A. 331 of 1968 and S4 of 1971) are by the Union of India, the...

Swastika Metal Works Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10

Reported in : 22(1982)DLT272

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Bansal and; M.C. Sekharan, Advs

S. Ranganathan, J.(1) The petitioner, M/s. Swastika Metal Works, is a firm carrying on business in the manufacture of copper alloys in its factory at Jagadhari in the State of Haryana. The petitioner imports for the...

Satinder Sandhu and ors. Vs. Bee Jay Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 633(2); ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 7and 9; Emplopees Provident Fund Act; Central Excise Act; State Insurance Act; Sales Tax Act; Income-Tax Act

Reported in : ILR1982Delhi671

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Parekh, ; Ameeta Misra,; M.C. Sekharan and;

J.D. Jain, J. (1) In Company Petition No. 12/81 the petitioners Shri Satinder Sandhu, P. N. Handa and N. S. Grewal constitute the Board of Directors of M/s. Bee Jay Engineers Private Limited, at present. They...

Kelvinator of India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 1987(13)DRJ17; 1988(15)ECC401; 1987(32)ELT663(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman,; M.C. Sekharan,; Baldev Raj,;

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.(1) The question involved in the Miscellaneous application (CM No. 3754/86) is whether the value of service contract (alleged by the petitioners to be optional but denied by the respondents) for after sale service...

Ashoka Cement Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Sales TaxArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : 22(1982)DLT363; 1982(3)DRJ393; 1982RLR629

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Jain and; M.C. Sekharan, Advs

H.L. Anand, J. (1) The Union of india seekstay u/s. 34 of the Arbitration Act of three suits filed under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure against them for recovery of sales-tax livable on...

Ambica Steel Rolling Vs. Customs Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tri ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas239(Delhi); 42(1990)DLT605; 1991(31)ECC229; 1991(52)ELT15(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Sekharan and; D.N. Sawhney, Advs

S.C. Jain, J.(1) The facts giving rise to this writ petition are that the petitioners are manufacturing iron bars falling under Tariff Item No. 26AA (ia) of the Central Excise Tariff. On 15th April, 1978, the...

Ravi Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 28(1985)DLT171

Advocate for Appellant : Harjinder Singh,; B.P. Singh,; M.C. Sekharan and;

ORDER Whereas an order F. No. 673.00 85-Cus. Viii dated 14-1-1985, has been passed by the Additional Secretary to the Government of India u/s 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities...

Baugur Rehman Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1987CriLJ23; 30(1986)DLT395

Advocate for Appellant : Harjinder Singh,; M.C. Sekharan and; P.S. Sharma, Advs

N.N. Goswamy, J.(1) This judgment will also dispose of criminal writ No. 78 of 1985 as both these cases involve similar point. The petitioners in these two petitioners were detained by virtue of orders passed on...