Advanced Search Results

Kishore Singh Vs. State Bank of India, Kanpur and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2620; [2000(85)FLR854]; (1999)3UPLBEC1763

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Dwivedi and ;Jitendra Pandey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. Similar question was involved in the case of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33231 of 1992, Mukesh Kumar Sharma v. SeniorDivisional Mortager. Life Insurance Corporation of India and another, disposed of by this...

Shakil S/O Shri NasruddIn and ors. Vs. Nashir Khan S/O Sri Bashir Khan ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34, 220 and 220(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3228

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Trivedi and ;M.C. Dwivedi, Advs.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Mr. N.K. Trivedi, Advocate along with Mr. M.C. Dwivedi, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S.N. Singh, learned Counsel for the respondents are present.2. The facts of the case in brief...

Balram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 17, 17(3), 18 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 332

Reported in : 1990CriLJ409

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Gupta, Adv.

Palok Basu, J.1. This Full Bench has been constituted to resolve the conflict in the two decisions, one in writ petition No. 9475 of 1986 Kripa Shankar v. District Magistrate, Gorakhpur and others, and the other...

Dr. Chandra Mohan Singhal and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2686

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Gupta and ;V.K.S. Chaudhary, Advs.

B.K. Rathi, J. 1. Both these revisions have been directed against the common order passed in suits Nos. 44 of 1993 and 45 of 1993 by IIIrd Additional District Judge, Hamirpur on 27.9.1993. The facts of...

Mool Chand Vs. Collector, Jalaun and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 84 and 85; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rule 285D, 285E, 285G and 285I

Reported in : AIR1982All141

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Dwivedi, Adv.

R.R. Rastogi, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner seeks the quashing of the order passed by the Collector on 7-4-1976 and by the Additional Commissioner on 11-6-1976 confirming the sale...

Gauri Shanker Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1974]34STC292(All)

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Dwivedi, Adv.

N.D. Ojha, J. 1. Firm Munna Lal Gauri Shanker was assessed to sales tax for the assessment years 1961-62,1962-63 and 1963-64. The amount of tax was subsequently sought to be recovered from the petitioner on the...

State of U.P. Vs. Mohar Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 4, 4(1), 18 to 28 and 28A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 54, 150 and 151

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2049

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Dwivedi, Adv. and; S.C.

R. K. Mahajan, J.1. This Judgment will dispose of aforesaid two first appeals arising out of the same notification and acquisition is also for the same purpose.2. First Appeal No. 1176 of 1990, has been filed...

Silver Chem Industries Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)(49)ELT634TriDel

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 2-1-1986 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-III Collectorate, Thane by which he had demanded duty amounting to Rs. 5,45,160.60 on the products termed as speciality...

Ficom Organic Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1997)LC319Tri(Mum.)bai

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Nitin Kantawalla

1. The brief facts are that the appellants imported into Kandla, a consignment of DI ISO BUTYLENE uantity covered by the Bill (DIIB) and filed a Bill of Entry in May, 1994. Of the of Entry,...

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Indrol Lubricants and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1998)LC98Tri(Delhi)

1. This is a Revenue appeal against the order passed by Collector (Appeals), Bombay, who has allowed the assessee's appeal seeking re-classification of their product "Indrol TQ" under sub-heading 2710.60 of the CET along with benefit...