Advanced Search Results
Chandrala Seshayya and ors. Vs. Chandrala Lakshmamma and ors.
Chennai
Feb-01-1951
PropertyCivil
Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7
AIR1952Mad88; (1951)IIMLJ72
M. Appa Rao, Adv.
ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. The only point for determination in this civil revision petition is whether the learned District Judge, Krishna, erred in law in holding that the Full Bench decision in 'Kesanna v. Boya Bala Gangappa'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFood Corporation of India Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-13-1997
Sales Tax
Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2
[1999]115STC148(AP)
ORDERLingaraja Rath, J.1. The question raised in this revision is whether the value of the broken rice, husk and rice bran, which are by-products of the paddy given by the petitioner to different millers for milling,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.A. Kunjalu Vs. V.V. Jose
Chennai
Aug-03-1993
Civil
(1993)2MLJ454
ORDERAbdul Hadi, J.1. Even though civil miscellaneous petitions are posted before me today, by consent of both the counsel, C.R.P., itself is taken up for disposal.The defendant has preferred this civil revision petition against the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Thalagadadivi Saty Venkata Subba Rao Vs. Yellapragada Ananda Rao and o ...
Chennai
Dec-01-1950
Service
Madras Subordinate Collectors and Revenue Malversation (Amendment) Regulation, 1828 - Sections 3; Madras Hereditary Village Offices Act, 1895 - Sections 10, 10(2), 10(3), 10(4), 10(6), 13, 13(1) and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9
AIR1952Mad491; (1951)IMLJ410
C. Rama Rao and ;M. Appa Rao, Advs.
Satyanarayana Rao, J. 1. In this second appeal, the plff. appellant seeks in substance a declaration that two orders of the District Collector, Krishna, dated 27-11-1937 & 31-7-1942 are Illegal & 'ultra vires'. In the suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandappa Vs. SadruddIn Ansari
Karnataka
Dec-12-1957
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 14; Hyderabad Court-fees Act, 1324F - Sections 39; Indian Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115
AIR1958Kant132; AIR1958Mys132; ILR1957KAR448; (1958)36MysLJ139
M. Appa Rao, Adv.
ORDER1. These two revision petitions are directed against the notification issued by the former Gov Government of Hyderabad under Section 39 of the Hyderabad Court-fees Act. The notification is No. 1 dated 20-1-1954 and published in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSankala Ramaswami and ors. Vs. Godavarthi Jagannathaswami
Chennai
Oct-11-1949
CivilProperty
Tenancy Law; Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 - Sections 3(2) and 189
AIR1950Mad369
M. Appa Rao and ;B. Srinivasamurthy, Advs.
Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. The defendants are the petitioners in these two revision petitions which arise in two suits instituted for possession and mesne profits, the main defence being that the suit properties, i.e., certain lands, form...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Krishna, G. Venkataramana and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Reptd. by It ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad
Aug-08-2007
Land Acquisition
1. The issue involved and relief claimed being similar in all the three OAs, they are being disposed of by the following common order: 2. It is the case of the applicant in OA 686/2006 that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. the Transport and Dock ...
Mumbai
Jan-13-1999
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1)
1999(1)ALLMR487; 1999(2)BomCR279
P. Ramswamy, Adv.
ORDERN.J. Pahdya, J.1. The petitioner is a Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai and has challenged the Award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbai, in Reference No. CGIT-2/13 of 1992.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFrancis Coutinho S/O Marian Coutinho and ors. Vs. Harilal S/O Kamlasha ...
Mumbai
Aug-23-1988
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A(3)
II(1989)ACC113; 1989(2)BomCR180
M.G. Bhangde, Adv.
M.M. Qazi, J.1 The appellants have challenged the Award dated 27th July, 1984 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Nagpur, rejecting the claim of the appellants for compensation.2. Deceased Louis Coutinho was the son...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChennuru Ramarao Vs. Gowri Sankar Talkies, Tekkali and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-28-1984
Contract
Andhra Pradesh Cinema (Regulations) Act, 1955 - Sections 9 and 11; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Cinematograph Rules, 1962 - Rule 12
AIR1986AP84
C. Poornaiah, Adv.
Punnayya, J.1. The appellant is the plaintiff. He lost the suit, which he filed for rendition of the accounts of the dissolved partnership of the first defendant by the second defendant and for an account being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »