Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m amin · Page 1 of about 116 results (0.103 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 23 2001

Ramesh Narsinhji Chauhan Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 420 and 498-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374

Reported in : (2002)1GLR125

Advocate for Appellant : Nitin M. Amin, Adv.

C.K. Buch, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the accused of Sessions Case No. 362 of 1991 tried and decided by Additional City Sessions Judge of Ahmedabad. The appellant (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2008

Bhanubhal Shanabhai Zala Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-05-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 344

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3828

Advocate for Appellant : G.M. Amin, Adv.

R.P. Dholakia, J.1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5-2-1999 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Sessions Case No. 142 of 1998 whereby, the appellant, original accused,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2011

Visnhubhai Naranbhai Patel and ors. Vs. Sureshkumar Kundanlal Lalchand ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-22-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Orders 7, 41 Rule 11

Advocate for Appellant : MR. G.M. AMIN, Adv.

1. By way of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the impugned order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 08 2017

Rohini M. Amin vs.the Bar Council of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mathews Nedumpara, Mr. A.C. Philip

$~62 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 3966/2017 Date of decision :8. h May, 2017 ROHINI M. AMIN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mathews Nedumpara and Mr. A.C. Philip, Advs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2005

Gujarat Water Resources Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Jal S ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2A), 3(27), 4(1), 7A, 10, 10(l), 10(4), 14 and 33(1); Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Shops and Establishment Act; Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961 - Rules 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 22, 27, 28, 29 and 30; Minimum Wages (Madhya Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1961 - Sections 14(1); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961; Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1975; Gujarat Civil Services Rules (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1998; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Services (Scales of Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(9); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 309

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2515

Advocate for Appellant : D.G. Chauhan, Adv.

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Gujarat Water Resources Development Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation'), petitioner, have filed present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, before this Court challenging the judgment and award dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2017

National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms & ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d May, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4447/2017 NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS & ORS ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2000

State of Gujarat Vs. Khumansinh Hemaji Chauhan

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-08-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 104, 107, 108, 109 and 306; Criminla Procedure Code - Sections 300(1), 378, 378(4), 378(6), 403 and 403(2)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1479

Advocate for Appellant : B.Y. Mankad, APP

C.K. Buch, J.1. Heard learned APP Mr. B.Y. Mankad for the appellant,learned counsel Mr. Nitin Amin for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and learned counsel Mr. K.R.Raval for Respondent no.3. Learned counsel Mr. Raval appearing for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1983

Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka Vs. Master Raghuveer Trust

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-05-1983

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(47), 45, 45(1), 46, 47, 48, 53, 54, 54B, 54D and 54E; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394(1)

Reported in : (1984)40CTR(Kar)163; [1985]151ITR368(KAR); [1985]151ITR368(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Srinivasan and ;H. Raghavendra Rao, Advs.

Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, at the instance of the Revenue has referred the following two questions under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (the 'act') : '(1) Whether, on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1993

Memon Ibrahim Haji Latif Sukhediwala Vs. Officer on Special Duty (Land ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-26-1993

Subject : LimitationProperty

Reported in : (1994)1GLR296

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.N. Soparkar

S. Nainar Sundaram, C.J.1. In this Reference, the question that engages our attention and calls for an answer at our hands is as to whether the Collector under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1982

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. G. Rajam and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-1982

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1987)64CTR(Mad)256

Balasubrahmanyan, J. - These two references deal with two dealers in company shares. This means that company shares are their stock-in-trade. They were being assessed to income-tax on the profits they were making year by year...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial