Advanced Search Results
Shaukat Bano Vs. Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Federation Ltd.
Delhi
Feb-17-1986
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)
1986(11)DRJ58
M. Ahmed and; Ashok Kumar, Advs
G.C. Jain, J. (1) MST. Shaukat Bano, the landlady, has filed this revision petition against the order of the Controller, dated May 9, 1985 dismissing her application for eviction of the tenant (respondent herein).(2) Smt. Sushila...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Parshad Vs. Appellate Officer Etc.
Delhi
Nov-30-1973
Property
Evacuee Interest (Separation) Act, 1951 - Sections 23; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108; Indian Easements Act - Sections 59
1974RLR111
Bawa S.C. Singh,; P.N. Talwar and; M. Ahmed, Advs
B.C. Misra, J.(1) Ram Parshad petitioner has filed this writ petition against the order of the Appellate Officer dated 21st April, 1964 by which he has reversed the order of the Competent Officer under the Evacuee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurari Lal Vs. Abdul Ghaffar and ors.
Delhi
Sep-07-1973
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 17, 17(1) and 18
ILR1974Delhi45; 1974RLR39
B.R. Malik and; M. Ahmed, Advs
Jagjit Singh, J.(1) In this second appeal the only question which arises for decision is as to whether under the provisions of section 18 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nematullah Vs. Mohd. Zikriya
Delhi
Nov-12-1980
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 39
19(1981)DLT55; 1981(2)DRJ22
M. Ahmed and; I.S. Mathur, Advs
Sultan Singh, J. (1) This is an appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called 'the Act') against the judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 29/5/1979. By the said judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Usman Vs. Mohd. Siddiq and anr.
Delhi
Mar-22-1985
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14
28(1985)DLT279; 1986(10)DRJ51
M. Ahmed, Adv
G.C. Jain, J. (1) This second appeal is directed against the order of the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi dated September 4, 1976. (2) The appellant Mohd. Usman was admittedly in possession of the premises in dispute...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiranjan Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Orissa
Jan-18-2007
ArbitrationLabour and Industrial
2007(4)ARBLR490(Orissa); 104(2007)CLT140
A.S. Naidu, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 39, of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Appellant-Contractor inter alia challenges the Order dated 05.12.2000 passed in Misc. Case No. 249 of 1999 arising out of T.S...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrem Parkash Kapoor and ors. Vs. Atma Ram Kirpa Ram
Delhi
Jan-30-1976
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2 (1); Delhi Rent Control Act (Amendment) Act, 1975 - Sections 3
AIR1976Delhi316; 1976RLR204
M. Ahmed, Adv
1. This is a defendant's Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the appellate judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Delhi, dated 14th January, 1975, by which he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRashid Khan Vs. Union of India
Delhi
May-12-1975
Property
Evacuee Interest (Separation) Act, 1951 - Sections 6; Indain Evidence Act; Indain Evidence Rules - Rule 12B
1975RLR463
P.N. Talwar and; M. Ahmed, Advs
S. Rangarajan (1) The order of Shri H.R. Nair seems to be vitiated by an error, apparent on the face of the record, because he observed that there was nothing on record to suggest that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Rajeswari International Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, Custom H ...
Chennai
Nov-04-2016
Service Tax
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of File NO.R-698/CHA, leading to issuance of a decision in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGrasim Industries Itd Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai
Jun-29-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)64TTJ(Mumbai)357
ORDERBY THE BENCH:This appeal by the assessee for the asst. yr. 1993-94 is directed against the order of the CIT(A) upholding certain additions and disallowances.2. The. assessee is one of the biggest Indian companies in which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »