Advanced Search Results

Roshan Beevi and ors. Vs. Joint Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20(3), 21, 22, 22(2) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 99, 193, 225, 228, 241, 339 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 36(1), 43, 45, 45(1), 46, 160(1), 164, 167(1), 438 and 439; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT289(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : M.R.M. Abdul Kareem, ;M.M. Abdul Razack, ;K.A. Jabbar, ;M. Abdul Nazeer, ;P.M. Jummakhan, ;P.M. Prem Nazirkhan, ;Rangavajjula Krishnamurthi and ;A.A. Lawrance, Advs.

Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. The above five writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, have been filed challenging the legality and validity of the orders of detention in the respective cases, passed under Section...

K. Srinivasan Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 51, 110, 110(1), 110(2), 119 and 124; Export Control Act

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC257; 1987(27)ELT656(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : M.R.M. Abdul Kareem, Adv.

1. In both these writ petitions, the petitioner is one and the same. However, the facts slightly differ. Therefore, I will first deal with W.P. No. 11392 of 1985. 2. On an information received on 11th...

S.H. Jiffri Kareem Vs. the Addl. Director, Enforcement Directorate, Ma ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3086

Advocate for Appellant : M.R.M. Abdul Kareem, ;Sr. Adv., for M/s M. Abdul Nazeer, ;M. Abdul Malik and ;S. M. Raziaq Ali, Advs.

Somasundaram, J.1. At the parties and the facts on the basis of which the reliefs are claimed in these three writ petitions are common, they are disposed of by a common order. 2. The case of...

K. Narayanan Vs. Collector of Customs and Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(11), 2(39), 104, 107, 108, 138B

Reported in : 1990(26)ECC134; 1990(47)ELT346(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : M. Abdul Kareem, Adv. for M. Abdul Nazeer, Adv.

ORDER1. This Writ Petition coming on for hearing on Friday, the 2nd day of December, 1989 and Thursday, the 16th day of February, 1989 upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, the...

H.N. Mariam and ors. Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise, Sankarankoil ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10, 13, 27, 47, 49, 52 and 140; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3 and 11A

Reported in : 1984(16)ELT219(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.P.M. Abdul Kareem, Adv. for ;S. A. Kareem, ;K.A. Jabbar Zafrulla and ;Abdul Nazir, Advs.

ORDERMohan, J.1. All these writ appeals, which are directed against a common judgment of our learned brother, Ramanujam J. rendered in W.P. Nos. 10868 of 1981 batch, can be dealt with under a common order since...

S. Balasubramaniam and Others Vs. R. Muthu Krishnan and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993CriLJ242; 1992(40)ECC69

Advocate for Appellant : M.R.M. Abdul Kareem for ;M/s. M. Abdul Nazeer and ;S.M. Raziaq Ali, Advs.

ORDER1. W.P. Nos. 519, 521 & 523 of 1992 : The prayer in the writ petitions is as follows : 'To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in...

Hajee M. Mohamed Kassim and Others Vs. the Sub Inspector of Police, Ko ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2921

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.R.M. Abdul Kareem, Sr. Adv., for ;M/s K.A. Jabbar and ;M. Abdul Nazeer, Adv. and ;Mr. Chidambaranathan for ;Mr. K. Anbazhagan, Adv.

ORDER1. Though the petitioners are different in these petitions, they are disposed of together since a common question of law is involved. These petitions have been filed u/S. 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer...

M.A. Khader and Co. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Periamet Divisi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1970]25STC104(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : M.R.M. Abdul Kareem and ;P.M. Jummakhan, Advs.

Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. In W. Ps. Nos. 2577 to 2580 of 1965, the petitioner seeks in the main for a writ of certiorari to quash the assessment orders made by the respondent under the Central Sales...

Mohammad Maraicair Vs. Veyanna Meeru thevar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 - Order 41, Rule 10, 10(1) and 10(2); High Court Rules; ;High Court Orders; Madras A.S. Rules - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1954Mad894; (1954)IMLJ527

Advocate for Appellant : M.R.M. Abdul Kareem, Adv.

1. This is an appeal against the judgment of Panchapakesa Aiyar J. dismissing an application filed by the appellant herein for extension of the time for furnishing security for costs which he had been directed to...

Ananthu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 27TH SRAVANA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 5672 OF 2023 CRIME NO.978/2022 OF THRIKKAKARA POLICE...