Advanced Search Results
Firoj Khan Vs. Phool Singh and ors.
Uttaranchal
Nov-01-2007
Motor Vehicles
2009ACJ2669
Mr. Lokpal Singh
Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Mr. Lokpal Singh, counsel for the appellant and Mr. Pankaj Purohit, counsel for the respondent No. 3.2. This is the claimant's appeal seeking enhancement of amount of compensation awarded by the Claims...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLal Lokpal Singh Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Nov-18-1920
Miscellaneous
AIR1921All98; 59Ind.Cas.655
Ryves, J.1. In the course of a murder trial before the Committing Magistrate, the Magistrate, at the instance of the prosecution, issued summons to Lal Lokpal Singh to appear in his Court apparently to give the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Kumar Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner
Uttaranchal
Oct-20-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 14A
(2004)2UPLBEC77
Lokpal Singh, Adv.
Rajesh Tandon, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for issue of a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to initiate the prosecution against the officers of the B.H.E.L., Ranipur, Haridwar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ram Bharose and ors. Vs. Rex
Allahabad
Jul-12-1948
Criminal
1949CriLJ144
Bhargava, J.1. Lokpal Singh iS a zamindar of village Lohari Khera; and for sometime he was the assistant secretary of the Chhatri Sabha in the District of Etah. One of the objects 'of the Sabha was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sureshchandra Balchand Jain
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-25-1989
Criminal
Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj Vyapar Viniyan Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 1(3), 5, 5(2) and 16; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 240 and 241; Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961 - Rules 27 and 29
1990CriLJ2554
D.D. Vyas, Govt. Adv.
S.D. Jha, J.1. Appellant State of M.P. through this appeal challenges the acquittal of the respondent accused (hereinafter called 'Accused') of charges under Rule 29 of M.P. Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'Rules')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDalpatsinh Gambhirsinh Barad Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Jan-31-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 106; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 149, 193, 196, 201, 202, 217, 302, 304, 330, 342, 380 and 454; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41(1), 102, 174, 176, 313, 374 and 378; Constitution of India
(2008)2GLR1301
K.J. Shethna, Adv. in Criminal Appeal No. 209 of 1998 and; R.C. Kodekar, APP in Criminal Appeal No. 2
A.M. Kapadia, J.1. Nine accused persons ('A-1' to 'A-9' for short) were charged and tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad City, in Sessions Case No. 97 of 1992 for the offences under Sections 302/34,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Apr-20-2010
Criminal
Sri. Sarvesh Kumar Dubey
V.K. Dixit, J.1. By this appeal, the appellant Amar Singh seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 25.11.1997 passed by the learned Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Sessions Trial No. 388 of 1995 holding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAllahabad Bank Vs. Lokpal Singh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-20-2012
Education
Shri. Bhargava
1 F.A. 131/96 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA F.A. No.131/1996 .........Appellant/ Allahabad Bank, having its Head Office at Plaintiff:2. Netaji Subhashchandra Road, Calcutta and a Branch Office at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›