Advanced Search Results
Bhaiyalal and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-10-1991
CriminalFood Adulteration
General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 26; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(2), 403 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300; Constitution of India - Article 20(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 378 and 379 ; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 240, 240(1), 240(3) and 253
1993CriLJ29
Lokendra Gupta, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. By this petition under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the proceedings of the prosecution under Section 379, IPC, pending in Criminal Case No. 144 of 1990...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindra Singh S/O Maujilal and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-27-1990
CivilLimitation
Madhya Pradesh Lok Abhikaranon Ke Madhya Se Bis Sutriya Karyakram Ka Karyanvayan Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 7, 7(2), 8 and 8(2); Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 47 and 53; Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 7; Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960; Madhya Pradesh Gramo Me Ki Dakhal Rahit Bhumi (Vishesh Upabandh) Adhiniyam, 1970
1991(0)MPLJ250
Lokendra Gupta, Adv.
ORDERT.N. Singh, J.1. Shri Lokendra Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. K. Jain, Counsel for respondents nos. 2, 3 and 4. Shri R. A. Roman, Govt. Advocate for respondents ' nos. 1 and 5. Heard...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Vimla Gangotia and anr. Etc. Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. ...
Madhya Pradesh
May-13-1994
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147, 147(2) and 217(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B
1995ACJ53; AIR1994MP201; 1994(0)MPLJ891
Shri. Lokendra Gupta
1. The two appeals have been filed against the award dated 24-12-1991 passed in Claim Case No. 1 of 1989, by the Member, Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal,Datia (for short, the 'Tribunal').2. Misc. Appeal No. 74 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jai Narayan Durga Prasad Vs. Satyanarayan Alias Dhonbabu and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-06-1991
Civil
Evidence Act - Sections 90
1991(0)MPLJ768
K.S. Tomar, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. This is a revision by the plaintiff /petitioner against an order dated 25th October 1990 passed in Civil Suit No. 27-A/1983 by Second Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Gwalior, whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSangita Vs. Narendra Singh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-07-1995
Motor Vehicle
1997ACJ861
S.S. Bansal, Adv.
A.S. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 23.11.1991 passed by the presiding Judge of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bhind.2. By the impugned order the Tribunal had refused to grant interim compensation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaburam and ors. Vs. Mahila Sudharani and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-11-1996
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10
1997(1)MPLJ313
R.K. Shrivastava, Adv.;K.B. Chaturvedi, Adv.
ORDERT.S. Doabia, J.Shri R. K. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners.Shri Lokendra Gupta, Advocate for the respondents Nos. 8 to 10.Shri K. B. Chaturvedi, Advocate for the State.Heard counsel.1. The brief facts which have led to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Kumar Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
May-20-2005
Criminal
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5 and 7
2005(3)MPHT466
Lokendra Gupta, Adv.
A.K. Gohil, J. 1. Appellant has been convicted under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for violating the provision of Section 6 (3) of the M.P. (Khadya Padarth) Sarvajanik Nagrik Purti Vitran Scheme, 1991...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwan and ors. Vs. Sachi Chandra JaIn and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-07-1991
FamilyProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 1(4) and 5
AIR1992MP258
J.P. Gupta and ;B.S. Agarwal, Advs.
T.N. Singh, J. Yesterday Shri Lokendra Gupta was not before me. He is in this appeal respondent No. 2 and today he has argued his own case. Yesterday I heard Shri R. D. Jain, appearing for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›