Advanced Search Results
Rakesh Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Uttaranchal
Aug-25-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 300
2005CriLJ227
Lok Pal Singh, Adv. assisted by; N.S. Pundir, Adv.
V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.1. This judgment shall dispose of the Criminal Appeal No. 115 of 2004 along with Criminal Reference No. 4 of 2004 and also the Criminal Jail Appeal No. 113 of 2004. Originally, four accused...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLok Pal Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-31-1985
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302
AIR1985SC891; 1985CriLJ1134; 1985(2)SCALE1400; 1985Supp(1)SCC76
S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. The appellant, Lok Pal Singh, has been convicted by the High Court Under Section 302/34 I.P.C. for murder of six persons which took place on 25th September, 1981 at about 2.00...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Saxena versus the State of Uttarakhand Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-30-2025
Criminal
[2025]1S.C.R.1454
Ms. Saakshi Singh Rawat
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 1454 : 2025 INSC 148 Ashok Saxena v. The State of Uttarakhand Etc. (Criminal Appeal No(s). 1704-1705 of 2015) 30 January 2025 [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Whether the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jodha Khoda Rabari and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and Etc.
Gujarat
Mar-06-1992
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 324, 326, 426, 436, 447, 504 and 506; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 25(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26, 27, 40 to 44 and 157; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 109, 162 and 167; Indian Telegraphs Act - Sections 25; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135; Law Officers' Rules
1992CriLJ3298
K.J. Shethna and; B.K. Parikh, Advs.
K.G. Shah, J. 1. On 20th September 1984 the people of Mangadh, a small village of Bhavnagar District experienced a horrifying nightmare when there was a carnage resulting in ten brutal murders in a span of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalbir Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.
Uttaranchal
Apr-08-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1978 - Sections 156(3), 204 and 482
2004CriLJ1169
K.S. Verma, Adv.
ORDERIrshad Hussain, J.1. The present criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal (hereinafter for short 'Code') has been filed for quashing the criminal proceedings in criminal case. No. 56 of 2001 after...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamal Jora and Another Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another
Uttaranchal
Dec-15-2011
Education
1. Heard Mr. Lok Pal Singh and Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocates for the petitioners, Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. J.P. Joshi, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand and Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKapoor Gramo Udhyog Vs. Chairman, Khadi and Village Industries Commiss ...
Uttaranchal
Mar-28-2006
Civil
AIR2006Utr75
Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2, Mr. N. C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 3 & 4. They are heard.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKala Devi and ors. Vs. Sultan and anr.
Uttaranchal
Feb-22-2006
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
IV(2006)ACC757
Mr. Lok Singh
Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the appellants; None for the first respondent. Mr. Subhas Upadhyaya. Advocate for the second respondent. They are heard.2. This is claimants' appeal for enhancement of the compensation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDayaluram S/O Badriprasad Vs. Rajendra Kumar Sharma S/O Late Ram Kisha ...
Uttaranchal
Dec-03-2009
Tenancy
B.S. Verma, J.1. Learned Counsel for both the parties are ready to argue the writ petition finally at the admission stage.2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukhtyar Ahmad Vs. Mangta HusaIn and Others
Uttaranchal
Jul-10-2012
Land Acquisition
B.S. Verma, J. (Oral) Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the appellant and Sri Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the respondents. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25-10-2010, passed by Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »