Advanced Search Results

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Arvindkumar T. Tiwari and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 4.2.2008 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.49/2008 by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad.2. Facts and circumstances giving rise...

State of Haryana Vs. Daya Nand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2004SC4358; JT2004(7)SC205; 2004(7)SCALE221; (2004)7SCC670

Advocate for Appellant : Manu Sharma,; D.P. Singh,; Avneet Toor and;

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. This appeal has been filed against the order of Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh dated 22nd of January, 2003, whereby the High...

Umesh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : JT2007(3)SC261; 2007(2)SCALE546

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar,; Laxmi Arvind,; Poonam Prasad and;

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Umesh, the accused in Sessions Case No. 15 of 1998 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Amravati, is the appellant before us. The appellant was charged under Section 302 of the...

Utkal Commercial Corporation Vs. Central Coal Fields Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 20; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137

Reported in : AIR1999SC801; 1999(1)ARBLR642(SC); JT1999(1)SC141; 1999(1)SCALE133; (1999)2SCC571; [1999]1SCR166; 1999(1)LC338(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar and; Laxmi Arvind, Advs

ORDER1. The only question which requires to be determined in this appeal is whether the application of the appellant under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act for appointment of an Arbitrator was barred by limitation. A...

S.N. Mathur Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(24), 3, 5, 6 and 57 - Schedule - Articles 58 and 64

Reported in : (2009)13SCC301; 2009(2)LHSC1213; 2009(2)JT592

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar,; Laxmi Arvind and; Poonam Prasad, Advs

R.V. Raveendran, J.1. This appeal relates to the stamp duty payable in regard to a deed of trust dated 9.8.1991 executed by the appellant and his two brothers. The executants paid a stamp duty of Rs....

U.P. Kattha Factories Association Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)749; AIR1996SC1997; JT1996(1)SC349; 1996(1)SCALE371; (1996)2SCC97; [1996]1SCR5; 1996(1)LC586(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar and; Laxmi Arvind, Advs

1. Leave granted. Heard counsel on both sides.2. The facts are that pursuant to the policy dated September 12, 1983, industrial units based on various forest produce i.e. Khair Wood were allowed to be set up...

Surendra NaraIn Alias Munna Pandey Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1997SC4156; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)31; 1998CriLJ359; JT1997(9)SC72; RLW1998(1)SC47; 1997(6)SCALE675; (1998)1SCC76; [1997]Supp5SCR97; 1998(1)LC113(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar,; Manisha Bhardwaj and; Laxmi Arvind, Advs

M. Srinivasan, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad confirming the order of conviction passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur on a charge...

Rebti Devi (Smt) Vs. Ram Dutt and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : 1998(2)BLJR792; [1998]229ITR373(SC); JT1997(9)SC179; (1998)1MLJ47(SC); (1997)11SCC714; [1997]Supp5SCR237

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar and; Laxmi Arvind, Advs

J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered: WITH IA NO. 1 OF 1996 IN SLP (C) NO. 17883 OF 1997 M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J. Civil Appeal No....

Rohtas Vs. The State of Haryana State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Laxmi Arvind

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.764 OF2009Rohtas & Anr. … Appellants Versus The State of Haryana … Respondent JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal takes exception to the...

Jahar Roy (Dead) Through L.Rs. and anr. Vs. Premji Bhimji Mansata and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 1; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR1977SC2439; (1977)4SCC562; [1978]1SCR770; 1978(10)LC19(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Majumdar and; Laxmi Arvind, Advs

P.N. Shinghal, J.1. The first two defendants, who lost in the trial court as well as on appeal, came to this Court on a certificate granted by the High Court under Article 133(1) of the Constitution...