Advanced Search Results

Kamla Bai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2003ACJ656; 2003(2)MPLJ139

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

Arun Mishra, J.1. The question for consideration in the instant writ petition is whether the Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'M.P.S.R.T.C.') is maintaining the account as mandated under Section 146 of...

The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi Vs. Achal Kumar J ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1)

Reported in : (1982)30CTR(Del)146; ILR1982Delhi939; [1983]142ITR606(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Lalwani and; Madan Lokur, Advs

Leila Seth, J. (1) The question referred for our opinion in these two income-tax references, at the instance of the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-11, New Delhi is as follows : 'Whether on the facts arid...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pratap Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 273

Reported in : [1982]138ITR27(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Lalwani,; Madan Lokur,; K.K. Jain and;

S. Ranganathan, J.(1) Two questions have been referred to this court under Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. They read as follows : '1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,...

Ku. Prachi Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Pre Medical Test Examination Rules, 2000 - Rule 2.5.1

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT657

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. By this writ petition preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to consider the...

Himanshu Flour Mills Ltd. Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board a ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT22

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

ORDERK.K. Lahoti, J.1. Petitioner has sought following reliefs :--(i) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order/letter and bill demanding Rs. 19,11,846.07 and declare the same...

Raj Kishore Vs. Shri Ram Agrawal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1997)ACC393; 1996ACJ1351

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

N.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Mr. Ashok Lalwani for the appellant and Mr. R.P. Agrawal for respondent No. 3.2. This appeal arises out of order dated 4.1.1996 passed by the First Addl. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Katni,...

Neena Bajaj and ors. Vs. Uttam Lakh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2006)ACC334; 2005ACJ1925

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Satna, in Claim Case No. 241 of 1995, dated 20.1.1996.2. Shortly stated, Sunil Bajaj (deceased) along with Kailash Sharma and Ashish...

Smt. Humera Khan. Vs. Mahesh Narayan ShrivastavA.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Civil

Acts : Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 34 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29/10/2002 passed by 5th Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No.25-B/2001 whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs.1,00,000/- has been...

All India Bank Officers. Vs. State Bank of India and Others.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Banking

Acts : State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 35, 35(1), 35(2), 35(13), 2(h) ; State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3A, 7(2), 65, 38(1), 38(14) ;

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

1. By means of this petition filed as public interest litigation the petitioners have challenged the action of the respondents No.1, 3 and 4 acquiring the business of the respondent No.2 under Section 35 of the...

Ruby Yadav and ors. Vs. Rajendra and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2000ACJ461; 1999(1)MPLJ29

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Lalwani, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the claimants-appellants have called in question the legal validity of the award dated 16.5.1997...