Advanced Search Results
Bhagwan Dass Vs. Union of India and Others
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Mar-07-2012
Land Acquisition
For the Applicant: Lalit Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R.N. Singh, Advocate.
DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A): 1. This is a remanded case from the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. We are, therefore, adjudicating the issues afresh as the order of the Tribunal passed on 8.1.2000 in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Chandra Prasad Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and ors.
Jharkhand
Mar-05-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 6; Damodar Valley Corporation Service Regulations - Regulations 96, 98 and 107
[2003(2)JCR225(Jhr)]
Debi Prasad, Sr. Adv. and; Lalit Kumar Lal, Adv.
Tapen Sen, J.1. At the very outset, it was found that some important pages of the records of this Writ Petition especially Annexure-4- has been torn and therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner filed a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalara Kharian and ors. Vs. Bhairo Nagasia @ Ganesh Nagesia and ors.
Jharkhand
Feb-25-2005
Civil
Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act - Sections 71A
[2005(3)JCR211(Jhr)]
Lalit Kumar Lal, Adv.
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. This appeal is against the Judgment and decree of reversal passed by Second Additional District Judge, Gumla whereby, the judgment and decree of the trial Court has been set aside allowing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sardar Paramjit Singh Vs. Amarjit Kaur
Jharkhand
May-10-2005
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1), 23A, 24 and 25
AIR2006Jhar11; II(2005)DMC299; [2005(3)JCR337(Jhr)]
Debi Prasad, Sr. Adv. and; Lalit Kumar Lal, Adv.
1. This appeal has been filed by the Husband Sardar Paramjit Singh against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court as Dhanbad on 2nd September, 1999 in Title (Matrimonial) Suit No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Gope and Vs. Smt. Dulari Devi
Jharkhand
Jun-19-2006
Property
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144
2007(1)BLJR243; [2007(1)JCR171(Jhr)]
Lalit Kumar Lal, Adv.
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. This second appeal is against the judgment and decree of affirmance passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No. I in Title Appeal No. 26 of 1998 dismissing the appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeel Kamal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Aug-14-2003
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226
[2003(4)JCR674(Jhr)]
Lalit Kumar Lal, Adv.
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. Lalit Kumar Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Mehta, JC to SC-II for the Sate respondents.2. The petitioner prays for quashing of the order dated 20.9.2001 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCesc Limited and ors. Vs. Pawan Kumar Kedia
Kolkata
Nov-21-2006
Electricity
Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 44, 44(39) and 44(44)
AIR2007Cal71,2007(1)CHN532
Lalit Kumar Poddar and ;Gourab Khaitan, Advs.
Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. The respondent was a consumer of electricity under the appellants. On the allegation of pilferage his electricity connection was disconnected without any notice. He was served with a demand by the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPurna Chandra Gaur Vs. Luthi Gaur
Jharkhand
Aug-05-2004
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
AIR2006Jhar107; [2004(4)JCR405(Jhr)]
Lalit Kumar Lal, Adv.
N.N. Tiwari, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the plaintiff- respondent against the judgment and decree dated 24th February, 1990 passed by the 2nd Additional District Judge, Jamshedpur in Title Appeal No. 24/5 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx. Havildar K.P. Pandey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Sep-30-2002
ServiceCriminal
defense Services Regulations; Army Act - Sections 34, 37, 63, 69, 80, 81, 116, 120, 120(2) and 133; Army Rules - Rules 34 and 81; Evidence Act, 1872; Army Regulations; Military Law
2003(3)SLJ463(Delhi)
Lt. Col. Lalit Kumar, Adv
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. The petitioner herein joined the Army Service as a Sepoy in the Regiment of Artillery. At the relevant point of time, he was promoted to the post of Havildar in Non-Commissioned Officer's rank...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharda Talkies (Firm) and anr. Vs. Smt. Madhulata Vyas and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-16-1995
CommercialLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18, 19 and 20 - Schedule - Article 22; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 19 and 32
AIR1996MP68; 1996(0)MPLJ697
R.S. Garg, J.1. The defendants Nos. 1and 3, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 6-3-1984 passed in Civil Suit No. 94B of 1976 by the First Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »