Advanced Search Results

Vikram Reddy, Presently Lodged at Central Jail, Aguada, Sinquerim, Bar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 22 and 50

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)499; (2002)2BOMLR768

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Chari, Senior Adv., ;Francis Saldanha and ;J.P. DSouza, Advs.

P.V. Hardas, J.1. The Appellant, who stands convicted for anoffence punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii) and 22 of theN.D.P.S. Act, 1985, and is sentenced to undergo RigorousImprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine ofRs.1,00,000/-, in...

Wessel Van Beelan Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 27, 35 and 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 245(2), 313 and 428; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR575; 2000CriLJ271

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Chari, S.A. and ;J.P. D'Souza, Advs.

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The appellant/accused was tried for possession of 45 grains of charas in contravention of section 8 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as the said 'Act'), which is...

Daphne E. Marie therese Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 50

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR11; 2000BomCR(Cri)11

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Chari, S.A. and ;J. Peter D' Souza, Adv.

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The applicant stands charged for possession of 5 grams of charas punishable under section 20(b)(ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act. The charge has already been framed against the accused and two prosecution witnesses have...

Suresh Kumar Rai vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:24. h January, 2018 Judgment Delivered on:12. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 360/2016 SURESH KUMAR RAI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Akshay Bhandari and Versus Mr.Parmesh...

Mukesh Kumar vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:24. h January, 2018 Judgment Delivered on:12. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 360/2016 SURESH KUMAR RAI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Akshay Bhandari and Versus Mr.Parmesh...

People's Union for Civil Liberties and others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 34, 46, 154, 157, 161, 164, 165, 173, 174, 293, 294 and 307; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 100, 102, 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 45 and 61; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1973 - Sections 21; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 64, 145 and 161; Coroners Act, 1871; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Sections 21; Terrorism Act

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR608

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Chari, ;V.R. Manohar, ;Arvind Bobade and ;A. Majeed Memon, Sr.Advs., ;Mrs. Usha Kejriwal, A.P.P., ;Madhao Jamdar, ;Mukil Puranik, ;P.M. Pradhan, ;B.P. Pandya, ;H.G. Misar, ;P.A. Sebastian, ;Mrs.

ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. These three writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the Mandamus against the respondents who are the State of Maharashtra, the Director General of Police, Maharashtra,...

Gaunter EdwIn Kircher Vs. State of Goa, Secretariat Panji, Goa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsFood Adulteration

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8 and 27

Reported in : AIR1993SC1456; 1993(2)ALT(Cri)103; 1993(2)BLJR909; 1993CriLJ1485; 1993(1)Crimes1183(SC); JT1993(2)SC285; 1993(II)OLR(SC)226; 1993(2)SCALE28; (1993)3SCC145; [1993]2SCR337

ORDERK. Jayachandra Reddy, J.1. The appellant, a German National, has been convicted by the trial court under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('Act' for short) and sentenced to undergo 10...

Natibabu Khadka Vs. State of Goa, as Represented by the Anti Narcotic ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 10

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR76

Advocate for Appellant : L. Chari, S.A. and ; J.P. D'Souza, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka1. This is an appeal against an order of conviction passed by the Court of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances at Mapusa dated 29th December, 1993 in Special Criminal Case No. 3 of 1993....

Dinesh Palyekar Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 41, 42, 42(1), 43, 50, 50(1) and 57

Reported in : 2007CriLJ106

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Chari, Sr. Counsel and ;J.P. D'Souza, Adv.

N.A. Britto, J.1. This appeal is by the accused, who has been convicted and sentenced under Section 20(b)(ii) (B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, ('Act' for short), for having been found in...

Milan Sarcanski Vs. the State Through Its Special P.P. Adv. Bhope

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : ndian Evidence Act - Sections 8 and 27; Narcotic drugs psycho. Sub. Act - Sections 20, 42, 43 and 50

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2028

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Chari, Senior Adv., ;Gopal Kanekar and ;Francis Saldanha, Advs.

Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. The appellant is an accused in Special Criminal Case No. 6/95 on the file of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Court of Mapusa. He challenges the convictions and sentence passed by the...