Advanced Search Results
Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.
Delhi
Dec-14-2005
Civil
Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta
126(2006)DLT49
Laliet Kumar, Adv
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. The nature around us is colourful and diverse. It is but natural that man saw, studied and unravelled nature and its laws. The great physicists Dr. R.P. Feynman gave a wonderful description of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Nand Kishore Garg and anr. Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors ...
Delhi
Feb-18-2011
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 108, 61, 62
Mr.Laliet Kumar And Ors.
1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes 1. In this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunder. Vs. Ramesh Dutta and ors.
Delhi
Apr-25-2011
Civil
Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 17(1)(d)(iv), 17(1)(d)(i), 7, 19(1)(c) ; Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 - Section 33B ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 176, 181 ;
Mr. Laliet Kumar; Mr. Hari Om Gupta, Advs.
1. The Petitioner was declared elected to Municipal Ward No. 153, Darya Ganj in the elections held on 5th April 2007. The said election was challenged by Respondent No. 1, Ramesh Dutta, on the ground that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nand Kishore Garg Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
May-23-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 108, 61, 62, 111
Mr. Laliet Kumar; Mr.Deepak Vohra, Advs.
1. The petitioners, as pro-bono publico, have preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of mandamus commanding the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (for short the Commission),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKolmet Builders Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.
Delhi
Oct-05-2007
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(50), 2(51), 2(61), 43, 62 and 64; Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) Regulations
2007(99)DRJ215
Laliet Kumar an; Mukul Dhawan, Advs. for Petition No.
S. Muralidhar, J.1. The question of law that arises for consideration in these petitions is whether the Respondents in each of them, i.e. the power distribution companies, are justified in clubbing the consumption against two or...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRahdey Shyam Bansal Vs. B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. and ors.
Delhi
Feb-18-2008
ElectricityCriminal
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 152, 152(1), 152(3) and 152(4); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183(1), 183(2), 184, 186, 189, 194 and 200; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300, 320 and 482
148(2008)DLT462
Laliet Kumar, Adv
ORDERS. Muralidhar, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('CrPC') challenges an order dated 14th March, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma, Delhi ('Special Judge') under the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Bansal and anr Vs. A.S. Rastogi
Delhi
Jan-10-2014
Land Acquisition
Mr. Laliet Kumar, Mr. Deepak Vohara
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h January, 2014. + RFA2282013 RAJESH BANSAL AND ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Laliet Kumar and Mr. Deepak Vohara, Advocates. Versus A.S. RASTOGI...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuhail Ahmed Khan Vs. Union of India and Ors
Delhi
Nov-20-2014
Land Acquisition
Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Sonam Gupta, Mr. Rajkiran Vats, Mr. R.P. Vyas, Mr. Salil Bhattacharya, Mr. Paruesh Khanna, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Mr. Sunil Dalal, Mr. Ajay Kalra, Mr. Rajiv Nanda
$~40 to 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI40 W.P.(C) 7869/2014, CMs No.16461/2014 (for stay), 18462/2014 (for appointment of receiver), 18673/2014 (for ex-parte stay) & 18674/2014 (for intervention) SUHAIL AHMED KHAN Through:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjay Gautam Vs. Delhi Waqf Board and Ors
Delhi
Nov-20-2014
Land Acquisition
Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Sonam Gupta, Mr. Rajkiran Vats, Mr. R.P. Vyas, Mr. Salil Bhattacharya, Mr. Paruesh Khanna, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Mr. Sunil Dalal, Mr. Ajay Kalra, Mr. Rajiv Nanda
$~40 to 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI40 W.P.(C) 7869/2014, CMs No.16461/2014 (for stay), 18462/2014 (for appointment of receiver), 18673/2014 (for ex-parte stay) & 18674/2014 (for intervention) SUHAIL AHMED KHAN Through:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuhail Ahmed Khan Vs. Union of India and Ors
Delhi
Nov-20-2014
Land Acquisition
Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Sonam Gupta, Mr. Rajkiran Vats, Mr. R.P. Vyas, Mr. Salil Bhattacharya, Mr. Paruesh Khanna, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Mr. Sunil Dalal, Mr. Ajay Kalra, Mr. Rajiv Nanda
$~40 to 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI40 W.P.(C) 7869/2014, CMs No.16461/2014 (for stay), 18462/2014 (for appointment of receiver), 18673/2014 (for ex-parte stay) & 18674/2014 (for intervention) SUHAIL AHMED KHAN Through:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »