Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: lal singh · Page 1 of about 1,966 results (0.264 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 01 2002

Lala @ Lal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-01-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2628; 2003(1)WLC669

Advocate for Appellant : Ankur Rastogi, Amicus Curiae,; Biri Singh and; Harendra

Goyal, J.1. Both the appeal against their conviction and sentence under Section 395 IPC were filed by the accused appellants Lal Singh and Ajit Singh.As usual the prosecution case begins with the first information report ex.P.3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2008

Dhan Bahadur Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-28-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4795; 2008(103)DRJ398

Advocate for Appellant : Rajender Kumar and; S.P. Pandey, Advs. in Criminal Appeal No. 236 of 1999 and;

P.K. Bhasin, J.1. The appellants have assailed the judgment dated 16.04.1999 and order dated 20.04.1999 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 20/96 whereby they were convicted for the offence punishable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1995

M/S. Shriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-13-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 2 to 4, 19(1), 133, 133(1), 226, 245 to 254, 246, 246(1), (2) and (3), 301, 366(12), 369; Uttar Pradesh Act, 1964 - Sections 24-A and 24-B; Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 7,8 and 10; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18G and 184; Parliamentary Act; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 2 and 3; Civil Procedure (Amendment) Code, 1908 - Sections 2(2) and (9), 28, 33 and 96; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 575; Molasses Control Order, 1961; Ethyl Alcohol (Price Control) Order, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Molasses Act, 1947; United provinces Molasses (Control) Act, 1947; Government of India Act, 1935; India (Central Government and Legislature) Act, 1946 - Sections 2 and

Reported in : AIR1996All135

Advocate for Appellant : Bharati Sapru and ;Sudhir Chandra Agarwal, Advs.

ORDERV.N. Khare, J.1. Two Judges of this Court having differed in their opinion on the question of competence of State Legislature to enact U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (U.P. Act No. XXIV of 1964) (in short,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 07 1971

Mangi Lal Vs. K.R. Pawar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-1971

Subject : Election

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Evidence Act - Sections 7, 8 and 11(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 403 and 406; Election Rules - Rule 90

Reported in : AIR1971SC1943; 1972MhLJ301(SC); (1971)2SCC399; [1971]SuppSCR822

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Singhvi,; U. N. Bachawali,; Sabhagmal Jain and;

Dua, J.1. Mangi Lal Joshi has appealed to this Court under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act 43 of 1951 (hereinafter called 'the Act') from the judgment and order of the Madhya Pradesh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2001

Lal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-17-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 157 and 313; Arms Act - Sections 7 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC788; 2001(4)WLN573

Advocate for Appellant : Doonggar Singh and; Swaroop Singh Rathore, Advs.

Mathur, J. (1). This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4.11.1997 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Barmer, convicting appellant for offence under Section 302 l.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and ,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1981

Nawla Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-30-1981

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)17

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Doongar Singh

Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. Appellant Nawla had been tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pali for the offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and by the judgment dated 12-7-76 was convicted for that offence and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1990

Lal Singh and 2 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-27-1990

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990WLN(UC)444

Mohini Kapur, J.1. The petitioners were convicted by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarhbas for various offences and their conviction has been maintained by Additional Sessions Judge, Kishangarhbas. Against this, they have preferred this revision.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2001

Cultor Food Science Inc. Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-2001

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 11, 11(9), 16, 45 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act - Sections 19, 28, 29 and 64; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 37, 38 and 41; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 32 and 33 ; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 45; Uncitral Model Law; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 56; Indian Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 134A and 227

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD149; 2001(6)ALT706

Advocate for Appellant : S. Niranjan Reddy, Adv.

C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Since parties to the C.M.A. and the C.R.P. are the same, they would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the C.M.A. 1st Respondent filed the suit against the appellant and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2001

Cultor Food Science Inc. Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Limited and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-2001

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(4) and (5), 11, 11(9), 16, 45 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19, 28, 29 and 64; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 37, 38 and 41; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 32 and 33; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 56; Indian Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 134-A and 227

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD154

Advocate for Appellant : S. Niranjan Reddy and ;T. Srikanth Reddy, Adv.

C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Since parties to the CMA and the CRP are the same, they would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the CMA 1st respondent filed the suit against the appellant and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

Niranjan Lal Vs. U.i.T. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2007Raj18; RLW2007(1)Raj350

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. Running from Court to Court for almost thirty years, trying to save his four shops and two staircases, the appellant has challenged the order dated 18-9-1988 passed by the Additional District Judge, No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial