Advanced Search Results
Lala @ Lal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jul-01-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395
RLW2003(4)Raj2628; 2003(1)WLC669
Ankur Rastogi, Amicus Curiae,; Biri Singh and; Harendra
Goyal, J.1. Both the appeal against their conviction and sentence under Section 395 IPC were filed by the accused appellants Lal Singh and Ajit Singh.As usual the prosecution case begins with the first information report ex.P.3....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhan Bahadur Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-28-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308
2008CriLJ4795; 2008(103)DRJ398
Rajender Kumar and; S.P. Pandey, Advs. in Criminal Appeal No. 236 of 1999 and;
P.K. Bhasin, J.1. The appellants have assailed the judgment dated 16.04.1999 and order dated 20.04.1999 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 20/96 whereby they were convicted for the offence punishable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Shriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and Ot ...
Allahabad
Oct-13-1995
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 2 to 4, 19(1), 133, 133(1), 226, 245 to 254, 246, 246(1), (2) and (3), 301, 366(12), 369; Uttar Pradesh Act, 1964 - Sections 24-A and 24-B; Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 7,8 and 10; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18G and 184; Parliamentary Act; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 2 and 3; Civil Procedure (Amendment) Code, 1908 - Sections 2(2) and (9), 28, 33 and 96; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 575; Molasses Control Order, 1961; Ethyl Alcohol (Price Control) Order, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Molasses Act, 1947; United provinces Molasses (Control) Act, 1947; Government of India Act, 1935; India (Central Government and Legislature) Act, 1946 - Sections 2 and
AIR1996All135
Bharati Sapru and ;Sudhir Chandra Agarwal, Advs.
ORDERV.N. Khare, J.1. Two Judges of this Court having differed in their opinion on the question of competence of State Legislature to enact U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (U.P. Act No. XXIV of 1964) (in short,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangi Lal Vs. K.R. Pawar and anr.
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1971
Election
Indian Companies Act, 1956; Evidence Act - Sections 7, 8 and 11(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 403 and 406; Election Rules - Rule 90
AIR1971SC1943; 1972MhLJ301(SC); (1971)2SCC399; [1971]SuppSCR822
L.M. Singhvi,; U. N. Bachawali,; Sabhagmal Jain and;
Dua, J.1. Mangi Lal Joshi has appealed to this Court under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act 43 of 1951 (hereinafter called 'the Act') from the judgment and order of the Madhya Pradesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
May-17-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 157 and 313; Arms Act - Sections 7 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 302 and 307
2001(3)WLC788; 2001(4)WLN573
Doonggar Singh and; Swaroop Singh Rathore, Advs.
Mathur, J. (1). This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4.11.1997 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Barmer, convicting appellant for offence under Section 302 l.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and ,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNawla Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-30-1981
Criminal
1981WLN(UC)17
Mr. Doongar Singh
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. Appellant Nawla had been tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pali for the offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and by the judgment dated 12-7-76 was convicted for that offence and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLal Singh and 2 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jul-27-1990
Criminal
1990WLN(UC)444
Mohini Kapur, J.1. The petitioners were convicted by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarhbas for various offences and their conviction has been maintained by Additional Sessions Judge, Kishangarhbas. Against this, they have preferred this revision.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCultor Food Science Inc. Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-12-2001
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 11, 11(9), 16, 45 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act - Sections 19, 28, 29 and 64; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 37, 38 and 41; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 32 and 33 ; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 45; Uncitral Model Law; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 56; Indian Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 134A and 227
2002(2)ALD149; 2001(6)ALT706
S. Niranjan Reddy, Adv.
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Since parties to the C.M.A. and the C.R.P. are the same, they would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the C.M.A. 1st Respondent filed the suit against the appellant and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCultor Food Science Inc. Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Limited and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-12-2001
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(4) and (5), 11, 11(9), 16, 45 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19, 28, 29 and 64; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 37, 38 and 41; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 32 and 33; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 56; Indian Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 134-A and 227
2002(1)ALD154
S. Niranjan Reddy and ;T. Srikanth Reddy, Adv.
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Since parties to the CMA and the CRP are the same, they would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the CMA 1st respondent filed the suit against the appellant and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiranjan Lal Vs. U.i.T. and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-21-2006
Civil
AIR2007Raj18; RLW2007(1)Raj350
R.S. Chauhan, J.1. Running from Court to Court for almost thirty years, trying to save his four shops and two staircases, the appellant has challenged the order dated 18-9-1988 passed by the Additional District Judge, No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »