Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: l n das · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.175 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 1995

In Re: Late Rajo Singh Ramautar Singh Alias Ganesh Shankar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-31-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 283

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Das, Adv.

Sachchidanand Jha, J. 1. This order will dispose of the caveat filed by Smt. Manorama Devi objecting to grant of probate of the Will of late Rajo Singh. The applicant has challenged the locus standi of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2010

Birendra Tiwari. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-05-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482; Indian Penal Code IPC) - Sections 407, 120B, 420

Advocate for Appellant : Smt. Anjana Mishra; Jaishankar Pathak, Advs.

1. The sole petitioner, who was proprietor of Patna Transport Organisation, has approached this Court while invoking its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash an order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2012

Priya Ranjan Kumar Mehta Vs. the State of Bihar Through Department of ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-19-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2295

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Akhilesh Dutta Verma, Mr. Das

CAV ORDER 1. The sole petitioner, who is an accused in a trap case registered for the offence under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 1949

Maheswar Naik and ors. Vs. Tikayet Sailendra Narayan Bhanj Deo

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-08-1949

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 90; Easements Act - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1951Ori327

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Das and ;S.N. Sengupta, Advs.

Jagannadhadas, J.1. Defendants 1 to 15 are the applta. in this second appeal. The pltf. is the Tikayet of Kanika, The defta. are the Bahar realdents of the Mouza called Chandrasekhacpur. The suit has been brought...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1999

Smt. Phuljhari Devi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Dec-15-1999

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Das, S. Dey and Amitabh Sahay, Advs.

Sudhir Kumar Katriar, J. 1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred with a prayer to declare the petitioner as number one candidate for awarding retail outlet...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2003

Ranvijay Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-04-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 17 and 21(2)

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Das, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State Government.2. The petitioner Ranvijay Kumar Patel, Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Surhari has come to this Court inter-alia submitting that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2005

NasimuddIn Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-01-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Article 143O

Advocate for Appellant : Arshad Jameel Hashmi and L.N. Das, Advs.Sanjeev Nikesh, JC

Barin Ghosh, J. 1. A voters list was prepared and on the basis of that voters list, the private respondent tried his luck at the election and lost. Subsequently he turned around and in the election...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2007

Dr. Kunal Hazari Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-27-2007

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Bihar Regional Development Authority Act, 1974 - Sections 2 to 11, 31, 32, 36, 37, 39 and 76; Bihar Municipal Act - Sections 3, 6, 7(1), 10, 12, 12(2), 32, 36 and 488; Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act 1992; Bihar Regional Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1981; Transfer of Property Act; Tenancy Act; Patna Regional Development Authority Act - Sections 32, 36, 37 and 39; West Bengal Town and Country (Planning and Development) Act - Sections 137; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 124E(2); Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act; Bihar Regional Development Authority Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Kumar, Adv.L.N. Das, Adv.Girija Shankar Prasad, Adv.Chitranjan Sinha, Sr. Adv.

Navin Sinha, J.1. The original petitioner, Dr. (Mrs) Iva Rani Hazari was the lessee of Khas Mahal lands measuring 6 Kathas 18 Dhurs 5 Dhurkies bearing Holding No. Nil, Circle No. 13, Plot No. 15, Ward...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1985

Ganesh Prasad Nayak Vs. Orissa State Co-operative Marketing Federation ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-20-1985

Subject : LimitationArbitration

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 137; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR333

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Jena, Adv.

D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. This application under Section 115 and Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code is directed against the order dated 22. 7.1982 of the Subordinate Judge, Bhubaneswar, rejecting the petitioner's application for revocation of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2009

The State Rep. by Cbi, Hyderabad Vs. G. Prem Raj

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-2009

Subject : CriminalService

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 2, 7, 11, 13(1), 13(2), 20 and 20(3)

Reported in : AIR2010SC793; JT2009(14)SC321; 2009(14)SCALE92; (2010)1SCC398; 2009(6)LHSC3932; 2009AIRSCW7290

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik,; Ranjana Narain,; P.K. Dey and;

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. In this Appeal, the judgment of the High Court, allowing the appeal of the respondent herein and acquitting him of the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) and Section 7...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial