Advanced Search Results
Jabar Mal Dugar Vs. Cit
Rajasthan
Sep-27-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)172CTR(Raj)624
Rajendra Mehta, for the Assessee L.M. Lodha, for the Revenue
N.N. Mathur, J.Heard Mr. Rajendra Mehta learned counsel for the applicant-assessee and Mr. L.M. Lodha learned counsel for the revenue.2. This is an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising out of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Laxmi Stores
Rajasthan
Oct-29-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)172CTR(Raj)548
L.M. Lodha, for the Revenue Vineet Kothari, for the Assessee
By the CourtWe have heard Mr. L.M. Lodha, learned counsel for the revenue.2. This is a reference application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act at the instance of the department.3. The respondent assessee firm...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. National Boring Co.
Rajasthan
Jan-10-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)175CTR(Raj)676
Sundeep Bhandawat, for the Revenue L.M. Lodha, for the Assessee
By the courtThis is a reference application under section 256(2) at the instance of the revenue, seeking reference of the following question for the opinion of this court.'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cit Vs. the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.
Rajasthan
Feb-14-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)174CTR(Raj)400
L.M. Lodha, for the Revenue Rajendra Mehta, for the Assessee
N. M. Mathur, J.This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order dated 28-2-2000, passed by the Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, whereby the Tribunal allowed the claim of the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUdaipur Soap Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Rajasthan
Oct-23-1986
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184(1), 184(8), 185(1), 185(2) and 263; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 22(2)
(1987)60CTR(Raj)26; [1987]167ITR613(Raj)
L.M. Lodha, Adv.
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, has referred the following five questions for the opinion of this court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred as '...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMutha Parasmal JaIn and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-03-1980
Commercial
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3) and 3(3C); Sugar (Retention and Sale By Recognised Dealers) Order, 1979; Levy Sugar Supply (Control) Order, 1979
AIR1981Raj139
M.M. Singhvi,; Rajendra Mehta,; L.M. Lodha and;
ORDERGuman Mal Lodha, J. 1. 'Price Control' with 'Cheers' or 'tears' is the real question though it has been camouflaged in legal constitutional debate.2. These 324 writ petitions have been filed by the Sugar Dealers of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawar and Co. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Feb-08-1982
Sales Tax
[1982]50STC318(Raj)
L.M. Lodha, Adv.
N.M. Kasliwal, J.1. As almost identical questions of fact and law are involved in both these cases, we dispose of these cases by one common order for convenience. We are stating the facts of Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Wolkem (P.) Ltd. Co.
Rajasthan
Feb-22-2002
Direct Taxation
Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 256
[2002]258ITR350(Raj); 2002(3)WLN551; 2002(3)WLN551
L.M. Lodha, Adv.
N.N. Mathur, J. 1. This reference application at the instance of the Revenue under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been filed seeking direction against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur, for referring the following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shakuntala Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
May-06-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1)
RLW2003(2)Raj1401; 2002(4)WLC41; 2002(5)WLN539
L.M. Lodha, Adv.
Chauhan, J. 1. The instant revision has been filed against the order dated 17.2.2001, by which the learned trial Court has vacated the temporary injunction passed in favour of the petitioner-plaintiff earlier. 2. The facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Laxmi Stores
Rajasthan
Oct-29-2001
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132(2), 256(2) and 271(1)
[2003]261ITR621(Raj)
L.M. Lodha, Adv.
1. We have heard Mr. L.M. Lodha, learned counsel for the Revenue.2. This is a reference application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Department.3. The respondent-assessee firm deals in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »