Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: l m lodha · Page 1 of about 73 results (0.111 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2001

Jabar Mal Dugar Vs. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-27-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)172CTR(Raj)624

Advocate for Appellant : Rajendra Mehta, for the Assessee L.M. Lodha, for the Revenue

N.N. Mathur, J.Heard Mr. Rajendra Mehta learned counsel for the applicant-assessee and Mr. L.M. Lodha learned counsel for the revenue.2. This is an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2001

Cit Vs. Laxmi Stores

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-29-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)172CTR(Raj)548

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Lodha, for the Revenue Vineet Kothari, for the Assessee

By the CourtWe have heard Mr. L.M. Lodha, learned counsel for the revenue.2. This is a reference application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act at the instance of the department.3. The respondent assessee firm...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2002

Cit Vs. National Boring Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(Raj)676

Advocate for Appellant : Sundeep Bhandawat, for the Revenue L.M. Lodha, for the Assessee

By the courtThis is a reference application under section 256(2) at the instance of the revenue, seeking reference of the following question for the opinion of this court.'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 14 2002

Cit Vs. the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-14-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)174CTR(Raj)400

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Lodha, for the Revenue Rajendra Mehta, for the Assessee

N. M. Mathur, J.This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order dated 28-2-2000, passed by the Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, whereby the Tribunal allowed the claim of the assessee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1986

Udaipur Soap Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-23-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184(1), 184(8), 185(1), 185(2) and 263; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 22(2)

Reported in : (1987)60CTR(Raj)26; [1987]167ITR613(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Lodha, Adv.

Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, has referred the following five questions for the opinion of this court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred as '...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1980

Mutha Parasmal JaIn and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-03-1980

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3) and 3(3C); Sugar (Retention and Sale By Recognised Dealers) Order, 1979; Levy Sugar Supply (Control) Order, 1979

Reported in : AIR1981Raj139

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Singhvi,; Rajendra Mehta,; L.M. Lodha and;

ORDERGuman Mal Lodha, J. 1. 'Price Control' with 'Cheers' or 'tears' is the real question though it has been camouflaged in legal constitutional debate.2. These 324 writ petitions have been filed by the Sugar Dealers of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1982

Pawar and Co. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-08-1982

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1982]50STC318(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Lodha, Adv.

N.M. Kasliwal, J.1. As almost identical questions of fact and law are involved in both these cases, we dispose of these cases by one common order for convenience. We are stating the facts of Writ Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2002

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Wolkem (P.) Ltd. Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-22-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 256

Reported in : [2002]258ITR350(Raj); 2002(3)WLN551; 2002(3)WLN551

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Lodha, Adv.

N.N. Mathur, J. 1. This reference application at the instance of the Revenue under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been filed seeking direction against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur, for referring the following...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2002

Smt. Shakuntala Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-06-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1401; 2002(4)WLC41; 2002(5)WLN539

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Lodha, Adv.

Chauhan, J. 1. The instant revision has been filed against the order dated 17.2.2001, by which the learned trial Court has vacated the temporary injunction passed in favour of the petitioner-plaintiff earlier. 2. The facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2001

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Laxmi Stores

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-29-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132(2), 256(2) and 271(1)

Reported in : [2003]261ITR621(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Lodha, Adv.

1. We have heard Mr. L.M. Lodha, learned counsel for the Revenue.2. This is a reference application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Department.3. The respondent-assessee firm deals in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial