Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: l govindaraju · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.067 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 01 1998

K. Ananda Mohan and Another Vs. the Corporation of the City of Bangalo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-01-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 295

Reported in : 1999(1)KarLJ507

Advocate for Appellant : Sri L. Govindaraj and ;Smt. H.R. Renuka, Advs.

ORDER1. The respondents 3 and 4 after obtaining the license and getting the plan approved constructed the building on premises bearing Nos. 37 and 37/1 at Richmond Road, Bangalore-560025. Since the construction put up by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1998

Veerabhadranna Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-04-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR2001KAR2350; 1999(2)KarLJ517

Advocate for Appellant : Sri P.S. Manjunath, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner was working as Divisional Controller in Bijapur Division of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. He invited applications for filling-up the posts of Drivers and after completing the formalities a selection list was prepared...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2015

M. Veerabhadraiah Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-2015

Subject : Education

-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.36789/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) c/w W.P.No.35106/2014...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 15 2006

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. S.D. Bandi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-15-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33, 33(1), 33(2), 33(3) and 33A; Industrial Disputes (Karnataka) Rules, 1957 - Rules 19(1) and 61

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR333]; ILR2006KAR2269; 2006(2)KarLJ511

Advocate for Appellant : L. Govindraj, Adv.

ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. The facts giving rise to this petition are as follows.-The respondent is a driver with the petitioner, the Karnataka Road Transport Corporation, Central Offices, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation' for short)....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2000

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Staff and Workers' Federati ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-20-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 - Sections 20, 34 and 45(2); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 31, 33 and 41; Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 24; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 36; Mysore Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1957 - Rules 4-A and 7(1); U.P. Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Act, 1956

Reported in : 2000(4)KarLJ370

Advocate for Appellant : Sri M.C. Narasimhan, Adv.

ORDER1. The KSRTC Staff and Workers' Federation (for short 'the federation') has filed this petition complaining about the violation of Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India and about the conditions of service/regulations framed in violation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1998

M/S. Tapoban Housing Finance Limited, New Delhi Vs. R. Udaya Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-08-1998

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25

Reported in : [1999]98CompCas549(Kar); 1998(5)KarLJ619

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. J.P. Udgata, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision application arises from the order dated 5-11-1993. The order sheet says on 5-11-1993 the decree-holder is present. Notice was issued to the judgment-debtor. Judgment-debtor absent and orders attachment of movables by 21-1-1994. From...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2011

Shri Abdul Salam S/O Late Abdul Khader. Vs. the Chief Traffic Manager ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-08-2011

Subject : Industrial Dispute

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 - Section 10 (4-A) ;

Advocate for Appellant : Sri S.B.Mukkannappa, Adv.

1. The petitioner/workman was appointed as a trainee driver in the respondent - Corporation on 23.5.1979. An articles of charge was issued by the respondent - Corporation to the petitioner alleging that, by producing a bogus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 1977

Sangappa Vs. the Land Tribunal and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-21-1977

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnatala Land Reforms Act, 1962 - Sections 44, 44(1), 45, 48-A, 66 and 67; Karnatala Land Reforms Act, 1961; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1978Kant47; 1978(1)KarLJ43

Advocate for Appellant : L. Govindaraju, Adv. for ;M.M. Jagirdar, Adv.

Govinda Bhat, C.J. 1. This writ petition arising under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, hereinafter called 'the Act,' raises an important question of law touching the jurisdiction of the Land Tribunal constituted under the Act.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1971

Laxman Vs. Ratnabai and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-05-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 18, Rule 5 - Order 20, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1972Kant27; AIR1972Mys27; (1971)1MysLJ500

Advocate for Appellant : L. Govindaraju and ;N.M. Jagirdar, Advs.

ORDER1. This revision petition is filed against the Order passed bv the Civil Judge on 8-9-1969 by which he directed that the suit will he reheard and disposed of by him. This arises in the following...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1995

Mars Constructions Vs. Karnataka Bank Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-07-1995

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 32

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2884; 1995(6)KarLJ22

Advocate for Appellant : L. Govindaraju, Adv.

Saldanha, J1. The appellants' learned Advocate points out that appellants 2 and 4 are the L.Rs. of deceased appellant No. 3 and that they are already on record. It is, therefore, unnecessary to take any further...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial