Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: kulshrestha · Page 1 of about 533 results (0.084 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 09 1995

Jag Pal Singh and Another Vs. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-09-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Krishi and Pradhogik Vishvavidhyalaya Adhiniyam - Regulations 26 and 14(1)

Reported in : AIR1996All271

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Bhattacharya and ;M.L. Shukla, Advs.

ORDERPetitioners, who are students of M.Sc. (Ag.) Agronomy and M.Sc. (Ag.) Horticulture of G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pant Nagar, Nainital, hereinafter referred to as the University, challenge the order dated 17-8-95, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1994

Dharmendra Kumar Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-26-1994

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 23(2), 24, 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : AIR1995MP210; II(1995)DMC461; 1995(0)MPLJ555

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Jain, Adv.

ORDER1. Revision petitioner is the husband of the respondent. They are governed by the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter called 'the Act' for short). Revision petitioner filed an application in the lower Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2005

Smt. Pushpa @ Pooja @ Bhawna W/O Shiv Kumar Gautam, D/O Sri Bal Kishan ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2005

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 21, 24, 25, 26, 28 and 28(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Uttar Pradesh Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2005All187; 2005(3)AWC2587

Advocate for Appellant : A.T. Kulshrestha, Adv.

Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. Heard Sri A.T. Kulshrestha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Goel and Sri S.R. Verma appearing for the respondents.2. By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 1994

Tejpal K. JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-1994

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 239, 244 and 245

Reported in : 1995LC452(MP); 1995(77)ELT820(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Chaurasia and ;S. Kulshrestha, Advs.

ORDERC.M.K. Prasad, J.1. Union of India, through Asstt. Collector, Customs and Central Excise, lodged a complaint in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences Court), Indore, impleading five persons as accused, including accused No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1999

Renaissance Forum, Allahabad Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-28-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992 - Sections 2(C), 3 and 9(1) and (4); Costitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 27, 29, 30, 51(A), (E) and (F) and 350 (A) and (B); Registration of Societies Act, 1860

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2103

Advocate for Appellant : H.S. Kulshrestha, Adv.

Binod Kumar Roy and R. K. Singh, JJ. 1. On going through this writ petition and the supplementary affidavit, it transpires that the real prayer of the petitioner is to quash the National Commission for Minorities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2005

Kallu and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-01-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 319, 397 and 401

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1194; 2006(1)MPHT440

Advocate for Appellant : Madhukar Kulshrestha, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. In this revision petition filed under Sections 397/401 of Cr.PC, the petitioners have challenged the impugned ordated 11-9-2002 passed by Sessions Judge, Bhind whereby the Court below allowed the application of the prosecution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2004

Parmal Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-13-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 and 450; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 60 and 156

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT95; 2004(2)MPLJ154

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Tomar and ;B.K. Kulshrestha, Advs.

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. The judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the Trial Court, is impugned in this appeal. The learned Trial Judge convicted the appellant under Sections 376 and 450, IPC and he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1990

Amarsingh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-31-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 97, 100, 300, 302 and 304; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1077

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Kulshrestha, Adv.

1. Three persons were booked for committing murder of Ram Roop, of whom two were acquitted. Appellant being one of them and having suffered conviction Under Section 302 IPC has challenged that and also sentence of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 1997

U.P. Financial Corporation and ors. Vs. V.P. Sharma and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-22-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ538All; (1998)1UPLBEC304

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra and ;Ashik Bhushan, Advs.

D.P. Mohapatra, C.J.1. This appeal filed under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules by the U. P. Financial Corporation through its Chairman, the Managing Director of the Corporation and the Board of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1995

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Hukumchand Mills Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1995

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ585

Advocate for Appellant : S. Kulshreshtha, Addl. Adv. General

ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. To tax or not to tax is the question. On applications of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh under Section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial