Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: kshirsagar · Page 1 of about 278 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 25 1992

Abdul Hamid Ismail Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-25-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 163, 420, 467, 468 and 471

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR235

Advocate for Appellant : A.A. Kshirsagar and ;A.V. Anturkar, Advs.

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This appeal and the Companion Appeal No. 516 of 1985 have been preferred by the same appellant. At the relevant time, the appellant was a police constable in the office of the Police...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2007

Radhabai W/O Laxmanrao Ghate Vs. Dattatraya S/O Raghunath Jog

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Debt Relief Act, 1975; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 11(2)

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR130; 2008(3)MhLj374

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv.

C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. This review application has been filed against the judgment delivered in Civil Revision Application No. 115 of 2006 by this Court. The parties hereinafter shall be referred to as decree-holder and judgment-debtor.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2011

Amol S/O Late Bhalchandra Joshi and ors. Vs. Deorao S/O Santoshrao Bho ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jan-06-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S.P. Kshirsagar And Ors.

Judgment :1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by the consent of the learned counsels appearing for the parties. 2. All these three matters challenge the common order passed on 21-8-2009 by the learned 4th Joint Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 06 2011

Amol S/O Late Bhalchandra Joshi and ors.Vs. Deorao S/O Santoshrao Bhon ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jan-06-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S.P. Kshirsagar And Ors.

Judgment :1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by the consent of the learned counsels appearing for the parties. 2. All these three matters challenge the common order passed on 21-8-2009 by the learned 4th Joint Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2008

Bhujang Nathuji Daf and anr. Vs. Ramkrishna Daulat Daf and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-14-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 137; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rule 2 and 2(2)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR165

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv.

Dharmadhikari, B.P., J.1. Heard Advocate Shri Kshirsagar for petitioner and Advocate Shri Patwardhan for respondents.2. The plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 777/1997 (re-registered as Regular Civil Suit No. 269/2001 before Civil Judge, Junior Division, Saoner)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2003

Shri V.S. Gajul, Being Ex-junior Clerk, Working in the Court of the Le ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240(3)

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR847; 2003(4)BomCR516

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Kshirsagar, Adv.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Upset by the order dated 29.01.1992 whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service and rejection of his administrative appeal. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

Anant Balaji Todkar and ors. Vs. Smt. Vijaya Ramkrishna Girde and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 3 and 5; Madras General Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 - Order 21, Rules 35, 36, 97, 99, 101, 103 and 104 - Order 22, Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR880; 2005(4)MhLj90

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Purohit, Adv. in W.P. No. 4277 of 2004 and W.P. No. (Stamp) 28701 of 2004 and ;S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv. in W.P. No. 87 of 2005

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Writ Petition 4277 of 2004 is filed by decree holders Ananta and others against the respondent Vijaya and her husband Ramakrishna challenging the order dated 23-7-2004 passed by 15th Ad-hoc Additional District Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2005

Brij Kumar S/O Madanlal Sethi and ors. Vs. Bimla Rani Wd/O Ramkrishan ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-19-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 6; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 and 115; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR339; 2006(3)BomCR857; 2006(2)MhLj470

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. In this Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, the revision applicants i.e. original defendants No. 2, 3 and 4 have challenged the order dated 16-7-1996 passed by the 10th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1994

Gopal Anjayya Falmari and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 60, 61, 101 and 102; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR116; (1994)96BOMLR144

Advocate for Appellant : T.E. Mane, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. This appeal is directed by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 22-12-1987 passed by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 90 of 1987, convicting and sentencing them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2005

Sarup Chand Vs. Siri Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-24-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(1), 13(3), 15 and 15(5); Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 25B(8); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) -Sections 115

Reported in : (2005)140PLR726

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jain, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is tenant's petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity The Act') challenging findings of the Appellate Authority, Barnala, recorded in its order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial